Replies

However, the more I thought about this, I was struck with another observation. WHY are the Darwinist so emphatic that EVERYONE agree with them? In other fields of science, someone who is not interested in the subject is not generally forced to learn it, but the Darwinists INSIST that everyone accept their claims.

That's a good question and I have often wondered about it as well. What's it to them if we do or don't believe what they say about dead monkeys in the ground and amoeba-to-human transformations? I mean, it's really up to them to argue convincingly for whatever it is that we are supposed to accept from them as true. Why to they rage when aren't successful at making a convert? They seem to have an attitude that we owe them unquestioning intellectual assent for anything they say. Even the slightest skepticism of their often specious and purile arguments invokes flaming wrath and brings to the surface some remarkable anti-God, anti-soul and anti-Christian sentiments. There's clearly something not normal about that.

When you really look at the way Darwinism is approached by its adherents, you will see a radicalism that is far more similar to Marxist or Keynesian economics than to Newtonian physics.

Speaking of John Maynard Keynes, he belonged to the Eugenics Society and also the Cambridge Eugenics Society. His nephew W.M. Keynes married Charles Darwin's grand-daughter. W.M Keynes was also a member of the Eugenics Society. John Maynard Keynes's mother belonged to a eugenical society. J.M. Keynes was gay too.

That's a good question and I have often wondered about it as well. What's it to them if we do or don't believe what they say about dead monkeys in the ground and amoeba-to-human transformations? I mean, it's really up to them to argue convincingly for whatever it is that we are supposed to accept from them as true. Why to they rage when aren't successful at making a convert? They seem to have an attitude that we owe them unquestioning intellectual assent for anything they say. Even the slightest skepticism of their often specious and purile arguments invokes flaming wrath and brings to the surface some remarkable anti-God, anti-soul and anti-Christian sentiments. There's clearly something not normal about that.

Which is why they constantly get accused of having an agenda. Because they're acting like they do.

I wish that those who are true scientists would speak out against the hijacking of science by the left like they do at the thought of it being influenced by conservative or Christian values.

Their silence on the issue of how science is being misused shows that they agree with it themselves.

Personally, I don't care whether someone agrees with special creation as stated in Scripture. I DO care when they go as far as demanding that what they believe is the only thing allowed to be taught in the public schools that my tax money is supporting.

That's a good question and I have often wondered about it as well. What's it to them if we do or don't believe what they say about dead monkeys in the ground and amoeba-to-human transformations? I mean, it's really up to them to argue convincingly for whatever it is that we are supposed to accept from them as true. Why to they rage when aren't successful at making a convert? They seem to have an attitude that we owe them unquestioning intellectual assent for anything they say. Even the slightest skepticism of their often specious and purile arguments invokes flaming wrath and brings to the surface some remarkable anti-God, anti-soul and anti-Christian sentiments. There's clearly something not normal about that.

Perfectly stated!

If, for instance, I knew an atheist who didn't believe in gravity, I might try to demonstrate for them why gravity is real, but I wouldn't claim that it was due to atheism.

As I posted last night, I am not aware of a SINGLE scientific or technological breakthrough in the last 150 that relied upon evolutionary theory. We have seen the invention of the airplane, the automobile, men on the Moon, radio, television, computers, the internet nuclear power and incredible medical advance and NONE of them relied upon Darwinian theory.

However, I am acutely aware of the death and destruction brought about by adherents to Darwinian eugenics, this destruction is ongoing and the death toll is at least ONE MILLION PEOPLE PER WEEK.