Over 206,000 US women have served in the Middle East since March 2003
Posted on 04/17/2009 7:27:31 PM PDT by JoeProBono
More American women have fought and died in Iraq than in any war since World War II. Over 206,000 have served in the Middle East since March 2003, most of them in Iraq. Some 600 have been wounded, and 104 have died. Yet, even as their numbers increase, women soldiers are painfully alone. In Iraq, women still only make up one in 10 troops, and because they are not evenly distributed, they often serve in a platoon with few other women or none at all. This isolation, along with the military's traditional and deep-seated hostility towards women, can cause problems that many female soldiers find as hard to cope with as war itself - degradation and sexual persecution by their comrades, and loneliness instead of the camaraderie that every soldier depends on for comfort and survival.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
Over 206,000 US women have served in the Middle East since March 2003
No comment...
IBTZ?
And who demanded that they were the same as men?????
Women in combat is not the ideal solution to the need for soldiers. My Daddy was a WWII combat veteran, and he was not in favor of either women or gays in combat. (In fact, he once stated that the few flaming homosexuals who started out in basic training did not generally make it through. War is hard to say the least and is not a social game. One commanding officer in more recent times said that when his group was ordered to “bug out” that the women were not able to do the heavy lifting of materials and machinery necessary to load up - so his outfit just didn’t “bug out” as ordered because they couldn’t. These parents who tell their daughters that they can do ANYTHING they want to do; well, yep, provided it’s affirmative action. Feminism has ruined this country, as has radical affirmative action.
Women have a vulnerability that men to not. Actually, several vulnerabilities. They do not belong on the battlefield, IMO.
I agree - this is sad. Though courage & bravery are up front & center with our soldiers, that bond made on a personal level with each other is an important one. They are away from home, loved ones, & friends. All they have is each other, which I believe keeps them strong & determined.
It’s sad to know that anyone who has what it takes to be in the military, can’t get the respect they deserve for putting their life on the line as well.
Or we could just genetically engineer female soldiers from Michelle Obama’s DNA. No problemo.
I agree. Of COURSE we cannot pull our own weight, move artillery, etc. What are they DOING there? It is all so very stupid.
I wouldn’t want my husband fighting Bad Guys with his back covered by some 17 year old GIRL. What about the whining? What about tears? PMS? Spiders?
I think it’s the old-biddie lesbo-feminists who wanted this, but they are happy to have OTHERS ‘do’ it. They just got to talk theory.
Disgusting.
Yeh! Then all they would have to do is look in the general direction of the enemy, and the enemy would go running!
You see, all these engineered soldiers wouldn’t have M.O.’s make up artist with them, to make them look less angry!
Beyond whining and tears, there is rape, menstruation, possible pregnancy, and documented physical weakness. Nothing we can do about them. Maybe chemically interfere with some of it, but that brings its own problems.
Your husband hypothetically being protected by a teenage girl is especially weak, if he is any kind of man (which I assume he is!) he not only can’t count on her for protection but will end up having to protect or rescue her.
Add to this the sexual politics introduced by female soldiers, not necessarily deliberately, and we have been seriously weakened as a force.
Finally, I hate what this does to women. It attacks the true strengths that women to have.
Oh yeah, and the kids they leave behind.
>Or we could just genetically engineer female soldiers from Michelle Obama’s DNA. No problemo.
You want MORE than one of her!?!
If they wanted to be nurtured they had zero business enlisting in the first place.
I have never been in a mixed unit but I have witnessed stuff like that in other units with females, it is bizarre the Orwellian culture that we now live in.
You mean a female version of Jango-Fett???
wait... they are complaining about the treatment by OUR guys?? are they nuts?
just wait until they are captured. then they’ll find out what sexual violence is all about (yet they won’t ever curse the libs for putting them in that situation... brilliant)
this is yet another article written by people that have no concept of the extent to which the enemy will go. yes, they will be gang raped. yes, they will have various things put inside. yes, they will have various parts cut off.
for some reason over the last few days i feel the need to give stark reminders of reality... since the libtards have never even visited the same planet as the rest of us
“Add to this the sexual politics introduced by female soldiers, not necessarily deliberately, and we have been seriously weakened as a force.”
That’s the whole point. Feminists have wanted to destroy the military for generations. The military by necessity affirms strong, masculine virtues and feminists are extremely threatened by this. Ultimately the entire left wants the military destroyed since it practices “discrimination” against the enemies of the U.S. and if there’s one thing lefties are proud of it’s how indiscriminate and undiscerning they are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.