To: JoeProBono
A person that does not keep their animals under personal
control 24/7 is a bad animal owner and a worse neighbor.
4 posted on
05/24/2009 2:38:26 PM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
A person that does not keep their animals under personal control 24/7 is a bad animal owner and a worse neighbor. Same with kids. I hate cats and kids. Keep your cats and kids away from my lawn.
Just because you think your kids are cute, and child molesters think your kids are cute, doesn't mean I do. They smell, they litter, they're loud and they're obnoxious. And cats give me allergies.
34 posted on
05/24/2009 2:58:11 PM PDT by
exist
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Agreed, but way too many cat owners feel that their felines are exempt from licensing, leashes or outside control. Instead, they let little Fluffy run loose at night to kill songbirds and small mammals for thrills and crap in your rose beds. As far as I’m concerned, ANY cat on the loose is a feral cat and should be treated as any other predator.
43 posted on
05/24/2009 3:19:19 PM PDT by
WorkingClassFilth
(Palin/Bachman 2012: Conservative Viagra)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
A person that does not keep their animals under personal control 24/7 is a bad animal owner and a worse neighbor.
Not certain about the neighbor part but I agree with the animal control. That being said, I'll take her as a neighbor over the potential murderers who choose to speed thru her residential area any day......
56 posted on
05/24/2009 3:58:25 PM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(This country isn't going to hell in a handbasket, it's riding shotgun in an Indy car....)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
A person that does not keep their animals under personal control 24/7 is a bad animal owner and a worse neighbor. Is that any reason to kill a cat in the bike lane?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson