Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Team of Researchers Blames Children's Films for Perpetuating "Heteronormativity"
LifeSiteNews ^ | 6/24/09 | Kathleen Gilbert

Posted on 06/24/2009 1:48:56 PM PDT by wagglebee

ANN ARBOR, Michigan, June 24, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Researchers at the University of Michigan have concluded that the love stories told in classic Disney and other G-rated children's films – such as the Little Mermaid - are partially to blame for the pervasiveness of what they label "heteronormativity." 

"Despite the assumption that children’s media are free of sexual content, our analyses suggest that these media depict a rich and pervasive heterosexual landscape," wrote researchers Emily Kazyak and Karin Martin, in a report published in the latest issue of the Sociologists for Women in Society (SWS) publication Gender & Society. 

Kazyak and Martin said they studied the role of heterosexual relationships in several of the highest-grossing G-rated films between 1990-2005. 

The results, say the researchers, illustrate two ways that the children's films "construct heterosexuality": through "depictions of hetero-romantic love as exceptional, powerful, transformative, and magical," and "depictions of interactions between gendered bodies in which the sexiness of feminine characters is subjected to the gaze of masculine characters."

"Characters in love are surrounded by music, flowers, candles, magic, fire, balloons, fancy dresses, dim lights, dancing and elaborate dinners," the researchers observed. "Fireflies, butterflies, sunsets, wind and the beauty and power of nature often provide the setting for - and a link to the naturalness of - hetero-romantic love."

The SWS press release on the research blamed what they called the "old ideals" of romantic relationships, specifically those found the Brothers Grimm fairy tales, which in many instances inspired the films' storylines, for "such heavily gendered depictions and glorified portrayals of heterosexual relationships."

The team says the results point to heterosexuality achieving a "taken-for-granted status" "because hetero-romance is depicted as powerful." 

"Both ordinary and exceptional constructions of heterosexuality work to normalize its status because it becomes difficult to imagine anything other than this form of social relationship or anyone outside of these bonds," they concluded.

"These films provide powerful portraits of a multifaceted and pervasive heterosexuality that likely facilitates the reproduction of heteronormativity."

The SWS press release concluded: "President Obama may have declared June to be Gay Pride Month, but entertainment for children therefore continues to perpetuate a less inclusive message, leaving those outside its confines with little to build their own dreams of happily ever after."

Sexuality expert Dr. Judith Reisman told LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) yesterday that the "politically correct" study reveals "the growing dominance of Heterophobia within academia and the spread of heterophobes among female professionals."

"Now, if the Ladies of the Sociology Society think pornography is becoming the heteronorm and that Disney is contributing to that form of what is really Heterophobia, they might have an argument," Reisman noted. 

"However, the Ladies of the Sociology Society appear to favor Homoerotic child propaganda, as the current academic party line dictates."



TOPICS: Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: childrensmovies; heterophobia; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: wagglebee
I honestly can't believe I just read that.

Do these idiots even know how humans propagate?

There's only one way to do that. And it's so freaking incredibly normal and fun.

Ha-ha!! Normal and fun. Normal and fun. Normal and fun. Butterflies and candles and sappy Disney music and romance. Normal and fun.

Deal with it, weirdos.

21 posted on 06/24/2009 2:02:21 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Suspicions? I thought Bert and Ernie had already come out.

parsy, who strangely is thinking about the two mermaids mentioned above. . .


22 posted on 06/24/2009 2:04:40 PM PDT by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I hate to sound so crass - but I think these two “researchers” need some sort of itch scratched that currently isn’t being scratched.


23 posted on 06/24/2009 2:05:08 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Wake me up when the homotoxic becomes heterocidal.


24 posted on 06/24/2009 2:05:25 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Disney didn’t create The Little Mermaid story. Hans Christian Anderson did.


25 posted on 06/24/2009 2:05:45 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I find it amazing that anyone felt the need to commission a study to find this out.


26 posted on 06/24/2009 2:06:33 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecht

Already happened.


27 posted on 06/24/2009 2:07:51 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hecht

Already happened.


28 posted on 06/24/2009 2:07:58 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I dont think he is. I think he is speaking ironically.


29 posted on 06/24/2009 2:09:49 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

A criminal waste of taxpayer dollars.


30 posted on 06/24/2009 2:15:33 PM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Characters in love are surrounded by music, flowers, candles, magic, fire, balloons, fancy dresses, dim lights, dancing and elaborate dinners," the researchers observed. "Fireflies, butterflies, sunsets, wind and the beauty and power of nature often provide the setting for - and a link to the naturalness of - hetero-romantic love."

But, they have been "advertising" that there is no difference between hetro and homo love. So if that is true, why do they have a problem with this? They can make all of the gay cartoons they want, but very few are going to go see it.

31 posted on 06/24/2009 2:16:35 PM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked (According to the MSM, I'm a fringe sitting, pajama wearing Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Not only that but it’s is the biological norm in order for our species to continue.

There ya go, bein’ all logical and stuff...sheesh /sarc.

Colonel, USAFR


32 posted on 06/24/2009 2:16:40 PM PDT by jagusafr (Kill the red lizard, Lord! - nod to C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
- Researchers at the University of Michigan have concluded that the love stories told in classic Disney and other G-rated children's films – such as the Little Mermaid - are partially to blame for the pervasiveness of what they label "heteronormativity."

Hello earth to researchers.......These are CHILDREN'S FILMS

What do they expect from Disney....."Bambi Fists Thumper"........

Oh wait That would be "homoeroticbeastialitnormativity"....

I have the sneaking suspicion this is a government funded research project to the tune of a couple of million dollars....

33 posted on 06/24/2009 2:18:30 PM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
There ya go, bein’ all logical and stuff...sheesh /sarc.

LOL!!

34 posted on 06/24/2009 2:19:07 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: edge10

Traditional tales are good, because they have stood the test of time, by definition. Anyway, Disney puts a unique “twist” on all of them.


35 posted on 06/24/2009 2:19:29 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

I wasn’t too sure about Disney’s Reluctant Dragon character, either.

Traipsing through meadows picking flowers ins’t very dragonlike JMHO.

Anyway, “heteronormativity” sounds perfectly OK to this healthy hetero.

Consider what a closed society the academaniacs who wrote this `study’ inhabit. And don’t go there after dark.


36 posted on 06/24/2009 2:19:43 PM PDT by elcid1970 (O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ohfertheluvva...

We even called them “Fairie Tales” and still they’re not happy?


37 posted on 06/24/2009 2:19:52 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

Oh, I am sure these two lesbians are there for one another....


38 posted on 06/24/2009 2:20:55 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Palin in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The SWS press release concluded: "President Obama may have declared June to be Gay Pride Month, but entertainment for children therefore continues to perpetuate a less inclusive message, leaving those outside its confines with little to build their own dreams of happily ever after."

You want "happily ever after"? Then reject deviant and abnormal sexual practices. Homosexuals are not happy. Giddy perhaps, and more and more often obnoxious, but not happy.

I'm constantly amazed at people who insist on tilting reality on its head and then complaining when it doesn't work out the way they expected.
39 posted on 06/24/2009 2:21:47 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

i am so sick of heterophobia.


40 posted on 06/24/2009 2:24:45 PM PDT by madamemayhem (there are only two places in the world: over here and over there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson