Orly is leading the issue, but to not follow-up and correct is dishonest on her part.
That’s why I take issue with some of her methods. I’ve said as much on other threads and have been lambasted for saying anything negative about her. I’m told to give her a break and cut her some slack because she’s the only one out there doggedly pursuing the issue at her own expense, which is true, but doesn’t negate the fact that she filed false information in her briefs to the court. If she did so unknowingly, I could excuse it. However, since I have addressed the issue with her, there are only three possibilities that I can imagine:
a) She didn’t receive the e-mail, so she is unaware of the travel advisory. I didn’t receive a rejection from the e-mail server to which I sent the e-mail, so I must assume the server processed it.
b) She received the e-mail but it went to a spam folder and was either not reviewed or was deleted, so she is unaware of the travel advisory.
c) She received and reviewed the e-mail but ignored it, in which case she is aware of the travel advisory but hasn’t corrected her briefs.
The main reason I’d like to see her and WND retract these claims is because the claims are represented as fact on FR and spread around like a virus. I’m waiting to obtain a copy of the original travel advisory before I post a thread debunking this particular claim with force and fact.