Posted on 10/31/2009 8:43:11 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
There's TRUE hope.
Palin for POTUS
Condoleezza Rice for VPOTUS
“I was a member of this site, under an old name, far longer than you (since 1999).”
LOL! Got banned for life, huh?
One, all of the networks you listed are ridiculous. And, two, I'm far to the right of Mitt, Huck, and Scuzzyfava-supporting-and-endorsing Newt. All I did was suggest that Palin ruined her chances with the same ignorant mass that elected Jimmy Carter number three, Obama. I like her, in fact I went to one of her final appearances in 2008 in Colorado Springs at the airfield, but now she has no chance.
It's funny. I remember people reacting with the same anger over people calling out Carter number two, W, over his F-ups; people reacting with the same ignorant anger at people calling Mitt what he was and is - a big government liberal - back in the run-up to McShame's nomination; and, the silly anger over those who wanted to support Ron Paul who happened to be the only one calling this financial mess before it happened. So, please, save your anger and just discuss your ideas; it's no wonder outsiders see us as a bunch of angry nutcases and certainly the reason why we have such a hard time meeting our financial goals on FreeRepublic.
Waiting for an answer to that question:
Who do you support in 2012?
I definitely think you are right. When Palin let Katie Couric manipulate her like that, she proved that she could not win a presidential election. Democrat ads will also excoriate her for “walking away from her job” in 2009.
Blah. Blah. Blah.
“I definitely think you are right. When Palin let Katie Couric manipulate her like that, she proved that she could not win a presidential election. Democrat ads will also excoriate her for “walking away from her job” in 2009.”
Sorry, but your guy is NOT going to win by having you bash Sarah...but feel free to try.
“The” question:
Who do you support in 2012?...
Say it.
Well, from this very recent poll, it shows that the ignorant masses don't think the way we think of Palin: "Seventy-one percent of those questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Wednesday morning believe the former Alaska governor and 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee is not qualified to be president, with 29 percent saying she does have the credentials to serve in the White House. Republicans appear split, with 52 percent saying she's qualified and 47 percent disagreeing with that view."
Source: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-7-in-10-say-palin-not-qualified-to-be-president )
Waiting for an answer to that question:
Who do you support in 2012?
Or it was an old name that no longer fit my new lifestyle. I was 22 years old when I began and one does a lot of growing up in ten years. Going to war does a lot to change things also.
Waiting for an answer to that question:
Who do you support in 2012?
Amazing description.
What is the name on your other account?
Before I waste time on a retread I want to be able to look at your posting history, what is your other freeper name?
Watch your step, all of your marbles just fell out of your bag.
That was the point of my original post. I was aking for other thoughts and inputs. I don't know who I support yet in 2012. If Palin gets the nomination, she'll get my vote, although I don't think she will. If somebody like McCain or Mitt gets the nomination, I'll vote on principle and will vote third party. But as of now, I don't know who I'm voting for.
So you’re a Mitten.
And embarrassed.
We all understand...
Can’t agree with Rice. She is not a conservative, is not popular, and would bring nothing to the ticket.
Palin needs another tough TEA Party type for Blue Collar appeal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.