Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steelfish

And I am just sure, that the Daily Mail Reporter (or his/her own ‘mumsie’) just looks ducky at 53.

Why is this news? Other than to rag on a woman (out enjoying a day with her kids in the park). Gee...damned if you do (be a hands on, no acting jobs kinda mom) or damned if you don’t (what if it was a ‘nanny’ playing with the kiddies?)

People age. They put on some weight as the years roll by. But lets make fun of people who look their age (what a shocking idea THAT is!!!)

Shame on the Daily Reporter...and those being cruel here. She is at a park playing with her children...NOT on the red carpet.

Give it a break folks.


23 posted on 11/12/2009 2:21:43 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (Mmm, mmm, mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PennsylvaniaMom

She looks really happy and relaxed. Probably glad that her Hollywood days are far behind her.


27 posted on 11/12/2009 2:23:57 PM PST by Palladin (The Obama Administration: "A Czar Too Far")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

She’d look perfectly nice except for the expression ... and all of us should be grateful we don’t have someone following us around taking pictures when we have a dumb look on our faces!


29 posted on 11/12/2009 2:26:02 PM PST by Tax-chick (My taxes pay Anoreth's salary or Dad's pension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

You make a good point. It’s one of the unfortunate by-products of celebrity.


57 posted on 11/12/2009 4:00:06 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson