Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Leisler
?Well, there you go, that certainly is the fault of the machine/software.

It certainly is. Macs don't need anti-viral ware... as of this time the total number of Viruses for Mac OS X in the wild, after ten years of OS X being in the wild, is ZERO. The business would not have lost a week of productivity due to viral infection if they had a Mac in that location. EVERYTHING that was being done on that computer could just as easily be done on a Mac... and even the Windows vertical solution database they run the optometry Office software on, being that it does not have to connect to the internet, could be run in a virtual machine sandbox under OS X, and be safe. All other work, especially internet ordering etc., could be handled by the Mac side... and be safely done without the need for cycle eating anti-anything ware.

56 posted on 04/11/2010 5:21:11 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE isAAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker
Macs don't need anti-viral ware... as of this time the total number of Viruses for Mac OS X in the wild, after ten years of OS X being in the wild, is ZERO.

Oh man, you just cannot be that dumb... I mean, I know you're an Apple zealot, but that's just a bald-faced lie. There's been OSX viruses and trojans since 2006, at least.

102 posted on 04/11/2010 7:02:46 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson