To: Cringing Negativism Network
I agree.
I'll say this: John McCain was obviously a CFR setup for Barack Obama in 2008; but Mitt Romney, out of sheer mental superiority, would have torn a new you-know-what in BO in national debates. In no way did "they" want that.
We ARE being manipulated.
19 posted on
04/20/2010 7:22:18 AM PDT by
jnsun
(The Left: the need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer.)
To: jnsun
Mitt Romney, out of sheer mental superiority, would have torn a new you-know-what in BO in national debates. That's the funniest thing I've read all day. Thanks for the laugh.
22 posted on
04/20/2010 7:23:18 AM PDT by
perfect_rovian_storm
(The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
To: jnsun
Seriously? On what planet do you think that would have happened. Romney couldn’t even debate that drunk Kennedy and win.
101 posted on
04/20/2010 8:24:38 AM PDT by
svcw
(Habakkuk 2:3)
To: jnsun
Romney couldn't even beat Huckabee or McCain in a debate last time. Even now I'm lectured by all the analysts on fox-romney-news that Romney talks so brilliantly about economics and business and jobs, BUT HE DOESN'T! He can't even explain what makes the economy work and how jobs are created. He goes on MSNBC on Morning Joe, talks in circles and whines that “Obama hasn't created any jobs”. What? He sounds no different than a liberal democrat spouting Keynesian theory about Obama “needing to create jobs”. He should be talking about how businesses and private industry create jobs, not Obama and the federal government! That they need to to lower tax on corporations and investment and get out of the way. This is basic, boiler plate stuff. Econ 101. Its unbelievable. He's like this on every issue. Go back and listen to his Chris Wallace FNS interview and on Laura Ingraham earlier this year during his book tour. He's terrible. Its cringe inducing.
204 posted on
04/21/2010 3:08:58 AM PDT by
JApost
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson