Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

**Obama Bombshell** Blue Hawaii: Health Department falsified Obama's birth records!
Youtube FRAUD IN THE USA: The greatest birth certificate fraud in history ^ | 06/25/2010 | Dr. Ron Polland

Posted on 06/25/2010 9:43:42 AM PDT by Polarik

Sometime between October 31, 2008, and July 27, 2009, the dates of Health Director Chiyome Fukino's two press releases, Hawaii amended Obama's birth record. A brand-new Certificate of Live Birth (not Certification of Live Birth) was issued to him.

The DOH Director decides what goes in or gets taken out of birth records. She went on record as saying that "President Obama posted a copy of his certificate on his campaign website" even though she has refused to authenticate it for the past two years. This created a conundrum that could only be resolved by changing Obama's birth records to match what is in that online copy - which is a stone-cold forgery, and Fukino knows it!

That forged COLB also has its origin within the DOH: watch the video to find out the shocking truth as to whose COLB was used for the forgery.

You'll also realize that you've been staring at a forgery this whole time and not realizing that the most obvious sign of it was right there under your noses.

Not only did Obama get a new birth certificate, the certificate itself was designed with him in mind as Rev. 10/08 - coincidentally, the date of Fukino's first press release (10/31/08). Hawaii ditched the old Certification of Live Birth and switched to a hybrid form called a “Certificate of Live Birth” - formerly the name of the long-form birth certificate.

Say, "Aloha" to Obama's new COLB (Certificate of Live Birth):

Click on the thumbnail for a full-size copy


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: alvinonaka; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; fukino; ineligibility; june; lfukino; naturalborncitizen; obama; ofukino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 601-611 next last
To: Polarik

BTTT


381 posted on 06/25/2010 9:28:59 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: tutstar
Canada Free Press reported a while back that the Fox news big show celebs were threatened not to touch the bc issue.

Just another bogus birther myth.

An unconfirmed story, and frankly ludicrous.

382 posted on 06/25/2010 9:36:19 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

BS again. They were purposely calling it a “birth certificate”, a “copy of his birth certificate”. IT AIN’T A EFFIN BIRTH CERTIFICATE.


383 posted on 06/25/2010 9:36:27 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
i wonder if the people in Alohaland are contemplating their future? Based on my experience the one who talks first gets the best deal as State's Witness..the others get the short end of the stick. I hope they realize for federal offenses, there are many states that judges can send prisoners to, they are not as nice as Hawaii. Maybe Arizona with illegal aliens would be appropriate?

http://www.bop.gov/

384 posted on 06/25/2010 9:37:20 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
...some people are not aware that a she was named a he name...

I checked, and the poster I was talking to has only posted here a total of seven times in six years. That's why they weren't aware of Obama's mother's strange name.

To be fair, I also asked my wife today whether she knew what Obama's mother's name was, and she admitted that she didn't. She keeps up with the news and listens to talk radio, but has never heard it.

385 posted on 06/25/2010 9:43:08 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: steve7
>>> "I am surprised that the Mossad has not exposed this fraud COLB. They are the top gun of counterintell., and certainly have enough reason to expose this fraud in the WH." <<<

WHY should they play their cards at this time? WHY would they prefer Joe Biden as prez? They won't expose him unless he seriously threatens Israel, it's their Ace up their sleeve and they'll continue poker faced.

Sometimes I seriously wonder if that row between BHO and Bibi was simply orchestrated street theatre, but we'll never know....

386 posted on 06/25/2010 9:43:34 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

so u know Hannity and kno he wasn’t threatened???? U don’t


387 posted on 06/25/2010 9:45:23 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping List-freepmail me to be included or removed. <{{{><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

I do hope you realize that if there are plans afoot to create a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH for zero, using your method, you have just made it impossible for them to do so?

That really appeals to me...LOL!


388 posted on 06/25/2010 9:47:48 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Keep on keeping on, Polarik. You’re doing a great job!


389 posted on 06/25/2010 10:00:49 PM PDT by Helen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

In 1961 clown, that’s BS.

Here are the vital record stats to classify race 50 years ago.

“Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and “other nonwhite.”

Being from a continent is not one of them. I suppose you think that the Kenyan could have self-Id as a Martian to today’s Hawaiian DoH and they would have accepted it. It’s all academic anyway because Obama has no long form birth certificate from 1961.


I suggest that you take your whine up with Kurt Tsue of the Hawaii Department of Health.

I believe that when asked on Friday, August 4, 1961 for his racial designation, Barack Hussein Obama Senior replied “African.” And the maternity ward admitting clerk at Kapi’olani Medical Center wrote down “African” and that term was transmitted to the Hawaii Department of Health.

They were not asking for the CHILD’s racial designation using an official American term for racial designations, they were asking for the parents’ racial designations and they accepted what Obama Senior said for the Certificate of Live Birth. I don’t think that they would have accepted “Martian!”

If the data from that Certificate ultimately went to the federal government, the combination of the mother’s racial designation of Caucasian and the father’s racial designation of “African” would put the child into the “other non-white” category.

If and until a prosecutor convenes a Grand Jury investigation and subpoenas both Dr. Chiyome Fukino and Dr. Alvin T. Onaka to testify under oath as well as subpoenaeing all the original birth records for Barack Hussein Obama II, we’ll never know for sure just what exists and what doesn’t and when any record came into existence.

Since both the Honolulu Advertiser and the Honolulu Star-Bulliten newspapers have confirmed birth announcements in their “Health Bureau Statistics” sections for a son born to “Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama” born on August 4, 1961 in their August 13, 1961 and August 14, 1961 editions, it is likely that a Certificate of Live Birth does indeed exist.


390 posted on 06/25/2010 10:09:20 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
“It’s been on there. Go look.”
The disclaimer has been? Since when? Now you've taken it down, but others have already gotten the other versions.

“People have been copying stuff from my Photobucket account for two years, some have been altering it and then claiming that I faked it.”

So you think it's a good idea to then create a fraudulent document and see what would happen if you tried to pass it off as real? KNOWING you've been accused in the past of DOING that? That makes no sense to me.

“Maybe you can stop for a minute to think about what are my goals here.”

Believe me, I have tried VERY hard to figure that out... Attempting to “punk” people - even if just for a little while - about something THIS serious is not justified by the gravity of what your goals are. If anything the gravity of what you're trying to do, and how damn important it is to get FACTUAL information into the public should have STOPPED you from doing this. It's precisely WHY this was a bad idea!

“I am the only person in America who is going after Factcheck, Politifact, Politico (next), and Hawaii to nail them to the wall - to show how they have been all working together on this.”

You're the ONLY one in America going after them? Are you, in fact, sure about that?

Have you filed a lawsuit against these agencies for fraud? Is the government investigating this in any real way? Seriously, all I know that you are doing is writing a book. I intended to BUY that book if I could afford it. I've watched (most) of the video you put up at YouTube, but I found it difficult. I was therefore waiting for your book...

“I want to put Factcheck and Politifact out of business so that they never get to influence another political decision.”

So, your goal is to prove that Factcheck and Politifact have fraudulently spread disinformation and fraudulent documents so that they are never ‘allowed’ to again deceive the public, especially in matters as important as following the US Elections Code. Right?

And, to achieve this you decided to CREATE a fraudulent document yourself to show how easy it is to do? What does that prove besides you'd make a good electronic document forger (if there is such a thing). You proved you're good at Photoshop and people in general can be easily tricked, especially if it's someone who has cultivated a certain level of trustworthiness.

But, how does that hold Factcheck and Politifact responsible??? What good does this exercise do?

“Want toget angry? Follow all of the lies they have been posting about ObamaCare.”

I am, and have been! What the heck does that have to do with THIS issue? And specifically with this thread? We already know they are liars. Now some of us don't feel too sure if you're one or not, too!

“BTW, what exactly have you done to stop anything?”
Everyone does what they CAN do, if they care about this. We don't waste people's time with LIES - that's for SURE! You've written a book, right? And have done a LOT of investigation into this.

Not all of us have the resources and time to do that. God put some of us in one position and others in another. People like me sometimes HAVE to rely on others — experts, those with more resources, and standing to do the ‘heavy lifting’, so to speak. BUT, make no mistake, I've done what I can and still stayed responsible to my children and my husband.

I have shared information with hundreds online for the last 2 years (maybe a touch more) about Obama, AND specifically this issue. I've debated people online. I've shared things with my friends via email. And I've talked to people in public within my town. I've written about some of it at my blog (as you may remember I believe there is one there ABOUT your video at YouTube — I know I sent that link out to my friends directly, and added it to my account's “favorites”).

But, you know what — that DOESN'T MATTER. We aren't talking about ME. We're talking about the action YOU took today. Stop trying to deflect the criticism. If I had done NOTHING more than come here today and just learned about ALL the things going on and still called you on trying to pass off a fake document as a real one to ‘see what would happen, and teach people lessons’ I'd still be within my rights to do so.

391 posted on 06/25/2010 10:36:14 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

The reason for the name was the father’s intense wish for a son. When he got a daughter, he went ahead with the name he had been ready to assign to a son. Weird, but just about everything concerning that crew is weird.


392 posted on 06/25/2010 10:36:38 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: jamese777; Red Steel
If the data from that Certificate ultimately went to the federal government, the combination of the mother’s racial designation of Caucasian and the father’s racial designation of “African” would put the child into the “other non-white” category.

Nope. From 5-7 of The Vital Statistics of the United States Volume 1 1961

The category white includes, in addition to persons reported as "white," those reported as Mexican or Puerto Rican. With one exception, a reported mixture of Negro with any other race is included in the Negro group; other mixed parentage is classified according to the race of the nonwhite parent and mixtures of nonwhite races to the race of the father.

393 posted on 06/25/2010 10:39:20 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1

Have you never heard of a “chartered flight”?


394 posted on 06/25/2010 10:58:47 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: jamese777; Red Steel
They were not asking for the CHILD’s racial designation using an official American term for racial designations, they were asking for the parents’ racial designations ...

True. There is no designation on the BC for the childs race. HOWEVER,they do ask for the race of the parents. Since the childs race is determined by the race of the parents AND births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and other nonwhite, - the parents race HAD to have fallen within these categories. Hawaii followed the federal standard in 1961. So if his father said his race was African, either the registrar put down Negro ( since they knew what the proper designation should be )or the certificate would have been rejected by the state.

395 posted on 06/25/2010 11:09:08 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Bump Dat...


396 posted on 06/26/2010 12:49:16 AM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Did say charters can enter..to Mombasa..but they are tour groups. Did this guy take a charter flight?

He needed a visa to enter Kenya.


397 posted on 06/26/2010 2:41:54 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Seriously doubt Obama Sr. was at the hospital.


398 posted on 06/26/2010 2:44:15 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
now.
But as a retired military air traffic controller, and 5 years with the FAA controlling
it's entirely possible to take a "Charter" or a "contract flight" to anywhere, once you PRE-Coordinate.
399 posted on 06/26/2010 3:15:10 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
Maybe his mother was hermaphrodite tramp ?

Bill Schultz is obozo's mother?

400 posted on 06/26/2010 3:16:24 AM PDT by newfreep (Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 601-611 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson