Replies

Fabian, I know nothing I say will ever change your mind – and that’s not my objective. I just like playing this game every few months because you play your hand the same way as almost every creationist that precedes you. That is, you’ve yet to answer a single one of my very straight-forward and simple questions. I am at a loss as to why that is.

Also, I note you show no contrition about some of the “real scientists” who creationists prop up as some sort of defense meme who have falsified educational histories. After playing this game for 10 years, I can count on one hand the number of creationists who have admitted that hucksters like Don Patton, Carl Baugh, Kent Hovind, et. al are phonies and liars – even if their message is one of perceived “good.” I see you, too, can’t admit one of your own is wrong.

Why not? Science makes a regular habit out of debunking bad science. Y’know, like those 3 or 4 “frauds of evolution” you surely know about. Frauds that were proven frauds by scientists. Anyway…

Some of your questions surely demonstarte your lack of knowledge about which you think you know so much. Evolution is not a tenent of any of those topics you named; it is merely an unproven theory which many university darwists nazis have tried to frame into a fact.

Whoops! Godwin Alert! It took you a few responses, but you’ve done it. You brought up the damn Nazi’s for some reason. I assure you, in my years as a “university darwist” (sic), I never saw a swastika anywhere. But you knew that. And while it may upset you, evolution is indeed THE major “tenent” (sic) of biology and genetics. Nothing makes sense in either discipline without evolution. Period.

Sorry, it is not going to work here. The simple fact of the matter is that the millions of clear transitional fossils of life forms turning into one and other do not exist. And another thing… theories are never proven in science.

Aha! Is that your tacit answer to my repeated question? You’d need to see “millions of fossils of life forms turning into one and other?” Hm. What, exactly, are you looking for? Kirk Cameron’s “Crocoduck?” Or some other fanciful lizard-dog or human-bird? I can’t help you out there. Evolutionary history isn’t quite that exciting I’m afraid. The transitional forms (of which we have evidence of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands) are slightly less garish. Evolutionary changes are incredibly small and took place over vast amounts of time. (Yes, even in “Punk Eek” world, if you’ve been told lies about that.)

Changes in allele frequencies through time.” That’s all evolution is. The mere fact that we have at least ONE transitional fossil, let alone thousands, should at least cause you to rethink your position. Why does that ONE exist? Did God make a mistake?

If they did the debate would have been over. I understand you believe it is over, but that is in your imagination, not in the fossil record! Facts don’t lie! And here are some amazing scientists of modern times that prove my points better..

Yes , yes, well played. Another call for evidence yields another website touting credentials and trumpeting 17th century scientists who didn’t accept the theory of evolution! (Ex. From the site of creationists: Astronomy - Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler… Great list. 3 brilliant guys who also didn’t accept Germ Theory. I guess that means Germ Theory (the one that says various germs, bacteria, viruses cause illness) is a lie too. THAT is your (and the website you cited) logic. Wonderful. Just think about that for a moment. What sense does that make?!

And this is the stuff you keep responding to me with! No evidence, no hypotheses, no way to falsify creationism, nothing of any merit. Just wishful – and downright odd – thinking.

The evidence of my stance is all over and yours simply does not exist. People reading this can easily find the truth and I did provide some links of very real scientists which you want to judge as not authentic for some reason. Sorry my friend, you just are wrong and the facts are not on your side. And now you are claiming that evolution is beyond the theory that it is but is a tenant of science. This is why I said you act like a darwinist nazi. You claim inaccurate points as though they are true and then go about trying to make my links false. surley you are not a nazi! But in your lost intellect you act like a tryant in framing the debate. Sorry, you just are way too caught up in your mind and it is deceiving you very badly...but feel free. It honestly comes down to the rejection and anger of God which His creation is all about us. It is obvious that we do not see macro evolution today and we do not have fossil evidence of it. Just the facts! Easily seen on the internet by various sources.