Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: whattajoke

The evidence of my stance is all over and yours simply does not exist. People reading this can easily find the truth and I did provide some links of very real scientists which you want to judge as not authentic for some reason. Sorry my friend, you just are wrong and the facts are not on your side. And now you are claiming that evolution is beyond the theory that it is but is a tenant of science. This is why I said you act like a darwinist nazi. You claim inaccurate points as though they are true and then go about trying to make my links false. surley you are not a nazi! But in your lost intellect you act like a tryant in framing the debate. Sorry, you just are way too caught up in your mind and it is deceiving you very badly...but feel free. It honestly comes down to the rejection and anger of God which His creation is all about us. It is obvious that we do not see macro evolution today and we do not have fossil evidence of it. Just the facts! Easily seen on the internet by various sources.


93 posted on 07/09/2010 8:19:00 AM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: fabian
The evidence of my stance is all over and yours simply does not exist.

Okay. I get it. Creationist "evidence" consists of lists of scientists, some from pre-Darwin days, who were/are creationists. Perhaps solid science like this is why ID failed so miserably in court.

very real scientists which you want to judge as not authentic for some reason.

If you give me the names of a million very real scientists who are creationists, and I could only supply one who accepted the fact of evolution, that doesn't change the fact that you've yet to provide anything in the way of evidence for creationism. Am I not making that point clear enough?

And now you are claiming that evolution is beyond the theory that it is but is a tenant of science.

Last post it was "tenent" and now it's "tenant." Psst, it's "tenet." So I guess I do agree that evolution is not a tenant of science. But it surely IS a tenet.

surley you are not a nazi!

No, I'm not a nazi. And don't call me Shirley. Or surly. Or a nazi. You're getting lazy with all this ridiculous name calling.

It honestly comes down to the rejection and anger of God which His creation is all about us.

Oh. Okay. Whatever dude. I'm a lying intellectual nazi who is angry with God. Right. On that note, FRiend, I wish you all the best in life and bid you and this absurd discussion goodbye. (Unless, of course, you figure out how to provide more than lists of 17th century astronomers who were creationists.)
94 posted on 07/09/2010 9:49:44 AM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson