Skip to comments.Sarah Palin Wants Levi Johnston To Disappear
Posted on 07/15/2010 9:54:16 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache
Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston shocked the world when they announced they were engaged again. The on-again, off-again couple seemed happy despite Sarah Palin's obvious disapproval of their reunion. It's no surprise considering her future son-in-law has betrayed and bad-mouthed the Palin clan on numerous occasions. According to a Palin insider, Sarah has already threatened him if he ever messes with her family again.
"Levi did everything he could to destroy Sarah and her family. He has accused Sarah of being a bad mother, a bad wife and a bad leader. How can he walk back into their life like nothing happened? He should think again," a Palin insider tells me. "He may have won Bristol back, but he will never gain the trust of Sarah. She doesn't forgive and forget."
Sources tell me that the 2008 Republican vice-presidential nominee is furious about her daughter's decision and thinks Bristol is making the biggest mistake of her life -- despite the fact that she and Todd eloped in 1988 without telling their parents. Levi Johnston and Bristol Palin
But it was ultimately Sarah who played grandma and comforted Bristol during her toughest times, while Johnston soaked up his fifteen minutes of fame by posing for Playgirl and hanging out with comedienne Kathy Griffin.
But it all comes back to politics. A Republican insider tells me Sarah is worried that her loose-lipped son-in-law will continue to ruin her political career and the public's perception of the Palin family.
"You can't control who your kids fall in love with, but Sarah wants this kid to go away. However, that doesn't look like it going to happen," the insider admits.
"So for the time being, Sarah is doing everything she can to protect her daughter and herself. And trust me, Levi has been warned. This isn't the sort of family you want to mess with twice."
“I haven’t seen that kind of lowminded prudishness since the 1980’s . “
Yes, cheer on “single moms”!
Is that what you have to do to keep endorsing Sarah Palin?
What in the world is a “co-religionist”?
I truly have no idea.
No, the truth makes tham crazy!
So like any other liberal mentality minded individual, name calling is the best they can do!
Plural’s are not formed with apostrophe’s!!!
Lowminded prudishness? Of course I meant passing judgment on others, trying to make yourself “better,” and counting to see how long it takes a newly married woman to have her first child.
Sticking your nose in where it has no business being? Tell me, are you Relief Society President by any chance?
*rolls eyes* Sometimes life happens, even in the best of families. It has NO bearing on the suitability of Sarah Palin to be President.
Someone who shares the same religion.
Sarah Palin can pretty much forget about running for President in 2012. I mean this appear like a White Trash family to me.
I just know that when you GO onto Free Republic, people do not always JUMP to the same conclusions. This is why we engage in debate about the facts of who would make a great president. I am so sorry that I set you OFF, and I hope that we can find A way to BRIDGE our disagreements.
I kinda liked that one myself. :>)
Oh, I see, So it's OKAY for YOU to “pass judgment” on ME!
But I am NOT allowed to have an opinion based on FACT that disagrees with YOUR opinion.
Oh, see by belittling ME, this makes YOU the BIGGER person.
Facts are facts and now may I introduce you to HYPOCRISY?
You have just demonstrated hypocrisy.
Look at the facts and our differences will disappear.
As my friend told the son-in-law...”Touch her again and I’ll kill you; not a threat, a promise.”
What if Levi has been reborn, and saved by Grace. Has anyone considered that possibility?
Well, as the late, great theologian and philosopher, J. D. Sumner once said, "If an idiot is born-again, more than likely he'll simply be a born-again idiot."
I hope being Bible based has not turned into a crime on FR.
I also hope that facts, that don't soother Palin supporters don't make me some kind of social disease. Geesh!
I wonder if the lad is receiving some material benefits from some outside source to resume the relationship? It would be a great position from which to do severe damage to a presidential candidacy at appropriate moments with sudden focusing of the press on household problems and Palin’s role as mother and mother-in-law rather than on issues and political principles.
Sarah’s first child was born 8 months after she was married. You point it out like it means something and then call me a hypocrite.
Check the birth date of Patti Davis and the wedding date of Ronald Reagan and Nancy Davis and then tell me if you voted for Reagan.
gliddy gloop gloopy....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.