Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

11. Wave another driver in front of a third driver who has the right of way.
12. Drive as far forward as they can in a lane that’s about to close and then expect to be let in.


4 posted on 08/23/2010 8:34:51 AM PDT by Genoa (Titus 2:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Genoa

12. Drive as far forward as they can in a lane that’s about to close and then expect to be let in.


Actually, the new normal is to keep traffic in both lanes until the road tapers to the single lane. It is the zipper effect and traffic flows much better. It also keeps from traffic backup that can cause further problems.


29 posted on 08/23/2010 8:42:54 AM PDT by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Genoa; All
Sorry, but your #12 is the legal procedure in most jurisdictions - ‘’Maintain traffic flow, and alternately merge at the point of constriction’’ (paraphrasing, but close enough). Done correctly, it can be a beautiful thing.

The real hazard is the self-appointed ‘’lane monitor’’ who uses the bumper of a motor vehicle as a penis extension to force his personal traffic code on everyone else.

That, and all the hammerheads who merge so early that they create a single-lane traffic jam for 2 miles.

64 posted on 08/23/2010 8:53:17 AM PDT by conservativeharleyguy (Democrats: Over 60 million fooled daily!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Genoa

DIsagree with your number 12. The BEST way for traffic to merge with the least delay is if everybody stays in the merging lanes up until the merge point, and then mixes in an “every-other” fashion.

People pulling into the merged lane a half-mile before the end of the lane just slow down the merged lane at the expense of the merging lane.

There’s a reason the merging lane goes on to when it ends. If they wanted people to merge a half-mile earlier, they would have ended the road a half-mile earlier.

So I ALWAYS drive to the end of a merge lane, and then merge. And you know, in almost EVERY case, at that point the merged lane is starting to pick up speed, and there are natural gaps so I can get in without slowing anybody else down.

That said, I do somewhat dislike people who pull OUT of the merged lane into a merge lane that has been cleared, just to cut in front of 4-5 people and pull back in.


86 posted on 08/23/2010 9:03:48 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Genoa
12. Drive as far forward as they can in a lane that’s about to close and then expect to be let in.

Yes, idiot #1 used to make me so mad. ...as well as idiot #2 who let them in.

I realized that there were lots of idiot #2s who would happily smile and wave 'em in.

So, now thanks to all those #2s, I'm now a #1 idiot as well.

95 posted on 08/23/2010 9:09:02 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Genoa

I used to believe that early compliance with a merge sign was the honorable and polite thing to do. But now I believe that traffic engineers want you to MERGE AT THE MERGER!


322 posted on 08/23/2010 5:11:06 PM PDT by plymaniac (2010=1994)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson