Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Verginius Rufus
Phrygia may have been under Lydian rule in the reign of king Croesus, just before the Persian conquest of Asia Minor, but the Phrygians and Lydians are quite distinct. Both spoke Indo-European languages, but Lydian was related to the languges spoken in Anatolia in the second millennium BC (Hittite, Luwian, and Palaic), whereas Phrygians invaded later from the Balkans--their language was closer to Greek than it was to Lydian.

Homer has Phrygians in Asia Minor already at the time of the Trojan War but that's probably a mistake. Even Homer nods...

7 posted on 09/24/2010 7:33:12 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

Homer was right on the money. Phyrgians, plus the Nubian pharaoh, among other things (all consistent within Homer, and he is after all the only source for the story that survives and isn’t derivative of it), show the correct date of the Trojan War. It’s a narrow window, too, because the Phrygians crossed from west to east into Anatolia, established themselves for just a few generations, then were ended as a realm by the Cimmerians, who burned the capital.


13 posted on 09/24/2010 8:29:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson