Furthermore, even Balducci used a lot of “it is probable”, “they could be” etc. and never made any “pronouncements” — his own opinions are his own opinions.
I’m confident you are bright enough to understand
that at THIS STAGE
The Vatican too is taking advantage of ‘plausible deniability’
while also upping the ante and incrementally preparing the sheep for the coming disclosures.
Paola was rather tight lipped about the confidential conversations with Balducci before his death.
However, it was still fairly clear reading somewhat between the lines and somewhat not so between the lines—that Balducci had the ear and confidence of the Pope on the matter and was not some wild lone ranger or loose canon on it. There are others who are also in that category.
I suspect that if you had my decades of study in your bones on it . . . that you, too would understand more specifically and more emphatically the very carefully calculated pronouncements that the Vatican observatory folks have given to the public.
THEY ARE NOT merely voicing their personal opinions without any approval from the Pope or other hierarchy. That much is very clear.
For one thing, much more would have been said by some of them much earlier.
Given your level of skepticism, I won’t bother looking up the links to the current videos. It appears that you, too are somewhat wedded to a TYPE II ERROR . . . suffering evidently from the illusion that a TYPE II ERROR is LESS deadly than a TYPE I ERROR . . . when, of course, it is NOT.