Actually, eyewitness accounts are not circumstantial evidence but direct evidence.
What is pathetic is your effort to impeach these witnesses with nothing more than an insult--"a couple of retired military guys who believe in UFO's." No logic, nothing close to critical or empirical thought...just a sloppy little insult.
While it is obvious on the face of it that you are pressing a deeply held prejudicial opinion instead of being willing to consider evidence--any evidence--these men just presented the facts (corroborated evidence in many cases) of what they had witnessed and drew no conclusions as to what it was.
Of course, if you had watched the video before engaging mouth, you would have known that.
I think some folks ‘knower’s’ are broken.
You used all that space to say nothing. Well done.
Hey,
when a spit-wad master wannabe
can’t manage to figure out how to use
“circumstantial”
properly, it looks like we are left with a classic ignorant type Jr High level naysayer.
We should enjoy him while he’s dogged enough to hang around. This thread has a surprising paucity of such folks.