Israeli Spy Recounts Daring Mission When He Captured Nazi Adolf Eichmann...

FoxNews.com ^ | Published January 27, 2011 | By Leland Vittert

[Mayr Fortuna]

Holocaust survivors often refer to the "banality of evil" when describing how remarkably ordinary even the highest-ranking Nazis seemed after their capture for aiding the mass murder of more than 6 million Jews during World War II.

[Nachum]

Elwoood...

You causin a ruckus agin’?

[BykrBayb]

Hello again, n00b.

First time I saw you, you were defending pedophiles. (Metmom probably remembers that.) You recently spoke out against Dick Clark being allowed out in public, because he’s recovering from a stroke. Now you’re defending Nazis. Is there any line you won’t cross?

[headsonpikes]

Slaps forehead - Oh, woody is against Israel, and maybe Jews in general!

I wasn’t expecting to find such a cement-head numbnut here, I guess.

Hey, woody, come out and play so folks can kick your lame a**!

[SJackson]

Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

[BykrBayb]

I’m one of several FReepers who have addressed you on this thread. As far as I can recall, this only second time I’ve addressed you. The first time was because you were promoting pedophilia. I’ve seen you promoting other disgusting lifestyles, and objecting to clean lifestyles, but I didn’t bother addressing you on those subjects. If reading posts by a troll makes me a stalker, I think we’d have a hard time finding anyone on the Internet who isn’t a stalker. You, on the other hand, are in a distinct minority, thank God.

[trisham]

Not only was that post extremely rude, it didn’t address the issue. In other words, it was both ineffective and nonsensical. Perhaps you might consider another attempt, but this time, pretend you’re a mature adult with a brain.

[Elwood P. Doud]

But falsely accusing someone of “promoting pedophilia” is not rude? Perhaps you need to apologize.

[trisham]

I'm surprised that you're now denying the charge, since BB's post to you was hours ago, yet if I recall correctly, your response did not include a denial, but instead was simply a rude personal attack. Most people who are falsely accused would demand to know the proof of such a claim.

What do you suppose most readers would conclude from your response?

[tutstar]

Bump

[BykrBayb]

Falsely accusing me of lying without pinging me is rude.
Suggesting that an innocent bystander should apologize for your indiscretions is rude.
Your defense of pedophilia is beyond rude.

[wagglebee]

I find it difficult to label someone who defends pedophiles and Eichmann as anything other than a troll.

[trisham]

Indeed.

[xone]

let’s not forget that he was kidnapped and taken to a country that didn’t even exist when he committed his crimes

OMG, that's terrible. zot

[rmlew]

I liked By Way of Deception, by a former Mossad case officer. It was overall critical of the Mossad becoming self-serving (according to the author), but the methods it exposed were genius, especially the training. The Israeli government said it was a fraud, then tried to stop its publication due to state secrets being portrayed.
"By Way of Deception" is a lie not from the first word of the first page, but from the freaking cover. It's first lie is the motto of the Mossad. Victor Ostrovsky purposely mistranslated, the Mossad's motto , which is Proverbs 24:6 "for by wise guidance you can wage your war, and in abundance of counselors there is victory."

[rmlew]

Despite his being a dirtbag, let’s not forget that he was kidnapped and taken to a country that didn’t even exist when he committed his crimes.
Gemany should have tried him, but didn't give a damn. However, why the "despite". He wanted to exerminate Jews, and was brought to justice by the Jewish nation. Seems appropriate to me. How could it not be?

[antiRepublicrat]

Yes, governments usually try to get court injunctions stopping publication of national security secrets in a book when the book contains no factual information.

[rmlew]

Ostrovsky included fact and fiction with desire to misrepresent for political purposes. And Israel did sue, but lost in the US.

[antiRepublicrat]

And Israel did sue, but lost in the US.

That pesky freedom of speech. Israel can suck it.

[rmlew]

Freedom of speech does not cover classified information or libel. I showed that the damn title was a libel. So don’t lecture me about free speech until you know what it does and does not cover.