Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China bets on thorium (nuclear power)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/01/china_thorium_bet/ ^

Posted on 02/02/2011 12:59:11 PM PST by Minus_The_Bear

China has committed itself to establishing an entirely new nuclear energy programme using thorium as a fuel, within 20 years. The LFTR (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor) is a 4G reactor that uses liquid salt as both fuel and coolant. China uses the more general term TMSR (Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor).

The thorium fuel cycles produce almost no plutonium, and fewer higher-isotope nasties, the long-lived minor actinides. Thorium is much more abundant than uranium, and the reduced plutonium output eases proliferation concerns. The energy output per tonne is also attractive, even though thorium isn't itself a fissile material.

Thorium reactors are also safer, with the fuel contained in a low-pressure reactor vessel, which means smaller (sub-500MWe) reactors may be worth building. The first Molten-Salt Breeder prototype was built at Oak Ridge in 1950, with an operational reactor running from 1965 to 1969. Six heavy-water thorium reactors are planned in India, which has the world's largest thorium deposits.

(Excerpt) Read more at theregister.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Science
KEYWORDS: energy; lftr; nuclear; sourcetitlenoturl; thorium
Obama wanted his "Sputnik moment"? China is about to use this neglected technology to provide cheaper electricity for their growing cities.

Cheap energy = higher standard of living.

Too bad the greenies talked everybody in the USA out of nuclear development.

Article in WIRED magazine.

Infographic that explains the benefits of Thorium.

1 posted on 02/02/2011 12:59:12 PM PST by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

Let's hope it's not the Balthorium G that could set of the Doomsday Device!

2 posted on 02/02/2011 1:02:48 PM PST by NorCoGOP (OBAMA: Living proof that hope is not a plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

ping for later


3 posted on 02/02/2011 1:03:23 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

ditto


4 posted on 02/02/2011 1:05:17 PM PST by lack-of-trust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear
Once you've exhausted the energy potentil of thorium what you have is a pile of RARE EARTHS.

Sounds like a deal eh!

5 posted on 02/02/2011 1:09:40 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
That we developed this technology in the 50's and 60's, and it is China and India that are finally deploying it is sad beyond belief.

Time to start learning Mandarin.

6 posted on 02/02/2011 1:18:55 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

“even though thorium isn’t itself a fissile material.”

Editor did not fact check this!

If it’s not fissionable, then what fissions inside the reactor?

Or does he mean bomb-type fissionable? Th 233, odd Z, half-integral spin, low spontaneous fission rate, hmmm....


7 posted on 02/02/2011 1:19:16 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Hindi.


8 posted on 02/02/2011 1:28:21 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

I prefer Chinese food to Indian food.


9 posted on 02/02/2011 1:37:25 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
That we developed this technology in the 50's and 60's, and it is China and India that are finally deploying it is sad beyond belief.

Things happen for a reason. There are probably valid engineering reasons why this technology wasn't adopted here for the first power reactors. Either the problems have been overcome, or this set of reactors is a pet government project with little economic justification.
10 posted on 02/02/2011 1:38:11 PM PST by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

Just like the old Laugh In shows...Very Interesting.


11 posted on 02/02/2011 1:38:22 PM PST by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

And what is our energy policy? No Drilling, No Coal, No Nuclear just windmills and sun power. Yep, that will keeps warm at night. Throw the EPA under the bus.


12 posted on 02/02/2011 2:08:49 PM PST by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BikerJoe

If I remember correctly this was not used inn the 50’s because it does not produce plutonium as a by product. At the time plutonium was needed for the cold war.


13 posted on 02/02/2011 2:15:16 PM PST by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

IIRC, under neutron bombardment, Th233 becomes U233, which is fissile

thus the need for a breeder reactor


14 posted on 02/02/2011 2:47:01 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

I think Th233 is fissile too, it has the correct physics. There may be issues that make it less practical than a U bomb, but to dismiss Th as “not fissile” in the article is wrong, or deliberately misleading.

Many actinide isotopes have the potential to go Pop. Manhattan project picked the most practical ones they could that would have a short development time.


15 posted on 02/02/2011 2:50:27 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BikerJoe; who_would_fardels_bear

-——Things happen for a reason. ——

The reason of course is money. Oak Ridge Thorium bureaucrats/scientists lacked the salesmanship to prevail.

I see no reason it is sad. Let the Indians develop the technology and if successful, we can use it. To whine that America must do everything mostest and firstest fails to recognize it is a big world.


16 posted on 02/02/2011 2:58:52 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bert
I'm not saying we have to do it the mostest and the firstest. I just think we should be doing even a tiny bit of it ... by now.

We could be shipping thorium power plant components to other countries, or at least be sending engineers and architects to other countries to get them built.

Would do wonders for our balance of trade.

17 posted on 02/02/2011 3:05:48 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

via now Toshiba owned Westinghouse, we are selling reactors abroad and I’m not positive, but GE is also exporting reactors.

Westinghouse has 14 reactors in the approval process here. I think they will be approved and we will be back in the nuc business


18 posted on 02/02/2011 3:53:43 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson