Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/10/2011 4:52:14 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Descending opinion ping.


2 posted on 02/10/2011 4:52:55 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

This is where I post the HT pic and say “They didn’t look too dang hard.”


3 posted on 02/10/2011 4:54:28 PM PST by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

“We did already know that most parasitic organisms had evolved to be less sophisticated than their ancestors – they lost certain abilities that they no longer needed
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

HUH???

How is that evolution? this must be a different phenomenon, completely separate from evolution.


4 posted on 02/10/2011 4:55:31 PM PST by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Their ancestors were very sophisticated—could speak French without an accent, talk knowledgeably about wines, and solve Rubik’s cube in no time at all.


7 posted on 02/10/2011 5:25:07 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

And those ancestors supposedly developed those uselss traits and such why?
It’s all bologna. God created all creatures, and we all adapted to our surroundings. The key is we are all still what we were created to be.


12 posted on 02/10/2011 5:40:56 PM PST by vpintheak (Democrats: Robbing humans of their dignity 1 law at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Well, that explains the First Sasquatch...


18 posted on 02/10/2011 9:35:28 PM PST by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Democrats actually evolved (or devolved, if you prefer) from real human beings. Amazing!


25 posted on 02/11/2011 5:58:47 AM PST by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

“Darwin’s theory of evolution continued this idea, with the concept of a hierarchy of evolution. This way of thinking has led researchers and skeptics alike to look for less sophisticated ancestors in order to prove or disprove evolution,” Philippe explained. “What we now know is that evolution does not happen in a single direction – when people talk about a missing link, they’re generally excluding the possibility of more sophisticated ancestors.” “

—One of the things that separates Darwinism from Lamarckism and Haeckel is that it doesn’t continue with the concept of a hierarchy.

Darwin was also well aware that evolution was not directional, and that living things often became simpler instead of more complex. Many, many such cases are known. Not only is this not “new”, it’s not even uncommon. It’s particulary common among parasites.

Darwin himself studied such a case for 8 years before publishing Origin, which would become the textbook example - the barnacle. Such things are precisely what Darwin was attempting to explain, so it’s very odd to present this as “new”.

http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/02/basic_concepts_progress_primit_1.php


29 posted on 02/11/2011 9:44:38 AM PST by goodusername
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
"The findings mean that the worms had evolved from a more sophisticated ancestor through major simplifications. "

It is amazing to me how very much of the fossil record has to do with simplifications (i.e., Eohippus).

41 posted on 02/14/2011 6:37:52 AM PST by cookcounty (Knives, Guns, Enemies and Axx-Kicks: The Gentle Political Speech of President Barrimore Soetero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson