Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Why not?!
1 posted on 02/22/2011 10:10:42 AM PST by dont_tread_on_malik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dont_tread_on_malik

Quinn, the Rat in Illinois, won’t do it!


2 posted on 02/22/2011 10:16:48 AM PST by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dont_tread_on_malik

I hope our new governor Nathan Deal in GA decides to refuse to implement it. If you give a party and nobody comes it kind of screws things up.


3 posted on 02/22/2011 10:25:20 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dont_tread_on_malik
Our new Republican majority General Assembly in North Carolina is nearly ready to hand their bill over to our Democrat Governor (Bev Perdue) for expected veto. This should be fun. Go look on WRAL website link. http://www.wral.com/news/state/nccapitol/story/9150724/ Get some popcorn !
4 posted on 02/22/2011 10:26:24 AM PST by rhoda_penmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dont_tread_on_malik
There are parts of this though that are not up to the States, unfortunately.

Although not as big a deal as the individual mandate, one nugget tucked into this monstrosity is the change in FSA (Flexible Savings (Spending) Accounts). If your employer offers one of these, you now need a prescription from your doctor to receive OTC medicines for allergy, heartburn, children's cough medicine, etc. It's ridiculous and a hassle and all FSA providers / employers have to abide by the rule when applying for reimbursement. The net effect is to drive people away from these plans and make it as hard as possible to use.

5 posted on 02/22/2011 10:44:42 AM PST by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dont_tread_on_malik

Absolutely, they should all refuse to implement it. They would be implementing a law that is currently under a defacto injunction as unconstitutional. Implementing it puts them in violation of their oath of office.


7 posted on 02/22/2011 10:54:11 AM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson