Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Repeal the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (says Mike Barkley, Congressional Candidate)
GroundReport.com ^ | April 17, 2011 | Mike Barkley

Posted on 04/18/2011 11:22:11 AM PDT by Immerito

Repeal the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

by Mjbarkl April 17, 2011

Over the months since the Tucson massacre, not much has happened in Washington to address the problem, which is Too many guns, Too easy access. Inaction is understandable. They're all afraid of the big bad NRA and the gun netherworld behind it. There is another reason: following Justice Scalia's Supreme Court opinion in the Heller case, extended to all other jurisdictions under the McDonald opinion, all gun control is now in doubt. There is only one way to solve this problem and that is to take it head on: Repeal the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. I propose Amendment Resolution and Legislation as follows:

Phase 1 - The Resolution, Format is from H.J.RES. 438, 102nd Congress::

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States repealing the right to keep and bear arms.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid for all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States at any time after the date of its submission for ratification: 'Article--

1. Any right to keep and bear arms, whether under the Second Amendment to this Constitution, or under some pre-existing doctrine of natural law or common law or otherwise, or under Constitution or laws of any State, is repealed.

2. The privilege to keep and bear arms throughout the United States shall be under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.'

Phase 2 - A Tax; Following adoption of the constitutional amendment, a bill to tax:

1. There is imposed an annual tax on each and every firearm in any household as follows: a. first firearm, $10 b. second firearm, $20 c. third firearm, $30 d. fourth through ninth firearms, $100 each e. firearms in excess of the ninth, $1,000 each. 2. This tax is assessed and payable on each April 15 for firearms held by a household at the end of the preceding year, to be paid with a schedule listing firearm type, manufacturer and serial number, the schedule submitted along with the tax return of such member of the household as the members of the household may choose, with other members attaching a copy of that schedule to their tax returns as well indicating by which member the tax will be paid. Where firearms are owned by a partnership, if there is only one general partner the arms shall be included with the schedule of that general partner; where there is more than one general partner, the partners shall choose which partner will report the firearms. Where firearms are owned by a corporation, the corporation shall report and pay tax as if it were a household. Where fiscal years do not coincide with calendar years, reporting shall be as of the end of the previous fiscal year. Where firearms are owned by a legitimate museum, the museum shall report the ownership annually as if it were a household, but shall be exempt from the tax except for the penalties in section 4 below. Sham transfers, that is, transfers to a legitimate museum or to an entity with a different fiscal year, and then back again, shall be reported and taxed as if there had been no transfer. Sham exports, that is, export followed by reimportation shall be reported by and taxed to the exporter as if there had been no export. If a firearm has no serial number, the owner shall apply to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for the assignment of one, and upon receipt of the assigned serial number shall indelibly engrave that number at a suitable location upon the firearm.

3. This tax may be avoided by selling the firearm to a licensed gun dealer or by turning the firearm over to an official firearm collection location or by export before December 31 of the prior year. Once a month such collection locations shall turn collected firearms over to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for destruction, except that the Bureau may withhold from destruction such firearms as are of historical interest for later donation to an appropriate museum.

4. Any firearm lost or stolen will incur a $1,000 penalty in the reporting year it was lost or stolen. For any such lost or stolen firearm that is subsequently recovered by the owner that $1,000 penalty shall be rescinded and refunded, except if the firearm has been used in the commission of a crime chargeable as a felony an additional $1,000 penalty will be imposed.

5. For each firearm sold by a licensed firearm dealer that is subsequently used in the commission of a crime chargeable as a felony a $1,000 penalty will be imposed against that dealer for each such year in which that firearm was used in such a crime.

6. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Internal Revenue Service shall jointly promulgate regulations for administering this Act.

Join me. Run for Congress. Fix this.

Best wishes,

--Mike Barkley, Candidate for Congress, http://www.mjbarkl.com/run.htm


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: banglist; california; cwii; freefirezone; missaaronzelman; rkba; theywantusdead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last
Who's he running against?
1 posted on 04/18/2011 11:22:17 AM PDT by Immerito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Immerito

He’s in California....

Here’s his list of stuff he wants to do.

http://www.mjbarkl.com/run.htm


2 posted on 04/18/2011 11:25:26 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Now there's a winning set of propositions. See ya after the next Civil War, Mikey. Or not, since your chances of surviving the consequences of what you've proposed are somewhere between Jack and squat. And Jack left town.
3 posted on 04/18/2011 11:25:51 AM PDT by Noumenon ("How do we know when the Government is like that guy with the van and the handcuffs?" --Henry Bowman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

This would go all the way to the Supreme Court, where Chief Justice Roger Taney would rule in favor...


4 posted on 04/18/2011 11:25:51 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Who's he running against?

America

5 posted on 04/18/2011 11:26:11 AM PDT by r-q-tek86 ("It doesn't matter how smart you are if you don't stop and think" - Dr. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
The most idiotic piece of kaka that I've read in quite awhile. Chances for passage? About the same as Barky appointing Sarah Palin as Energy Czar and telling her to ‘have at it.”
6 posted on 04/18/2011 11:26:28 AM PDT by JPG ("Mr. President, GAME ON." - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

What a fool! We fought against Britain in 1776 to get away from laws like that!


7 posted on 04/18/2011 11:26:38 AM PDT by Greg123456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

Hey Barkley! I might need my gun, just in case someone tries to take it away.


8 posted on 04/18/2011 11:26:51 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

He is running against no one and probably has not even sent in the required paperwork and monies to run for Congress.

If he is serious. Then he is a serious joke.

Just some dork from Manteca, California.


9 posted on 04/18/2011 11:26:51 AM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

” Who’s he running against “ ? Most of America .


10 posted on 04/18/2011 11:27:12 AM PDT by fantom (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Molōn labe!
11 posted on 04/18/2011 11:27:55 AM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I truly hope you are correct.


12 posted on 04/18/2011 11:29:43 AM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Greg123456

“We fought against Britain in 1776”

And when the National Firearms Act was first proposed in 1934 the civil unrest and protests were so severe Congress dropped it.

As again in 1968, the people rose up so strongly that the proposed gun control act was quietly dropped.

I think we are a long way from a 1776 response based on our response to other federal laws.


13 posted on 04/18/2011 11:30:07 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
I'd rather repeal Mochelle's right to bare arms...

Just sayin'

14 posted on 04/18/2011 11:32:28 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (I am declaring 2011 to be the year of ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

It’s worse than just taking away 2nd amendment rights. It institutionalizes the right to regulate it in the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!!!

Someone ask this guy why in the world we even have States?


15 posted on 04/18/2011 11:33:22 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

“Manteca, California.”

Lard, California? Lovely...

I guess that makes him the Lard-a$$?

Colonel, USAFR


16 posted on 04/18/2011 11:33:47 AM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

Please Obama and your acolytes, take up this cause. Please start the judicial process on this amendment. It has no chance in hell of passing but would be another nail in the Obama re-election campaign of 2012. We need all the help we can get and self destruction works for me.


17 posted on 04/18/2011 11:36:08 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito; Tijeras_Slim; Noumenon; DBrow; r-q-tek86; JPG; Greg123456; The Sons of Liberty; fantom; ..

What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts


18 posted on 04/18/2011 11:36:57 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (A thorough knowledge of the Bible is worth more than a college education. TR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

If elected, you can be assured that his security detail will be armed, of course. For his protection.


19 posted on 04/18/2011 11:39:11 AM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

Repeal Mike Barkley.


20 posted on 04/18/2011 11:39:53 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.....Eagle Scout since Sep 9, 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson