To: SunkenCiv
Personally, I am sick and tired of the Anti Christianity demonstrated by BCE and ACE. The “common” era is the birth of Christ. Therefor there is no need for BCE, just BC and no need for ACE as AD does quite well. I believe the ACE and BCE scribes are the same people who hug trees. So save a tree over the millenia, to say nothing of the ink used by the unneeded letters.
13 posted on
05/09/2011 8:15:05 PM PDT by
Tuketu
(Democrats should be known as the National Democrat Party - NDP CASE CLOSED)
To: Tuketu
You’re right. My response is to simply say Before the Christian Era and After the Christian Era. Thus defeating their designs.
It’s a simple way to save the day. ;-]
18 posted on
05/10/2011 3:46:12 AM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Tuketu; SunkenCiv
Personally, I am sick and tired of the Anti Christianity demonstrated by BCE and ACE. The common era is the birth of Christ. Therefor there is no need for BCE, just BC and no need for ACE as AD does quite well. If you were familiar with YHvH's Word,
you would know that AD or Anno Domini
is blasphemous.
It states that the year of the LORD
(YHvH) did not always exist. It states that the creator of the universe
did not exist before the year zero.
Seek the face of YHvH in His WORD.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
20 posted on
05/10/2011 7:56:19 AM PDT by
Uri’el-2012
(Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
To: Tuketu
26 posted on
05/10/2011 11:45:13 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson