Alternative explanation: the paper doc was received from Hawaii in the mail and scanned and then converted into layers. Some fainter text and signatures went into one layer and darker stuff into another. Nothing much else would need to be done other than export to PDF.
Orly Taitz who is bringing the case to the ninth circuit is a poster child for inability to reason correctly about image scanning and processing. Her statement was "After the hourlong hearing, she said the document's serial number was out of sequence, the typing wasn't aligned, and it was printed on green paper instead of white paper like other Hawaiian birth records of that era." She doesn't seem to realize that the paper from Hawaii is new, not from "that era". It was produced by copying the old record on white paper from the book onto the new paper which was then stamped and signed.
The reader can figure it for themselves Palmer. Like sausage, its not always pretty.
Why criticize Orly here? She is not here and again, we can easily see her mistakes just as you do.
The point I’m making is this. Some people will criticize and call another’s contributions just crap and I don’t believe it helps the atmosphere at all.
I am surprised though, to see that you follow the subject.
I was under the impression you we’re saying the subject was just birther crap.