Wireless carriers reportedly surprised by Apple's iMessage feature

Apple Insider ^ | June 6, 2011 | By Josh Ong

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Yea... Well aware of that. What I’m not aware of, and why I asked, was whether or not the “server” would function as a local icloud rather than Apple’s cloud farm in NC.

I haven’t had time to drill down through all the reports on the announcement. I just figured I’d ask the Sword and see if he knew.

I was just cracking wise, that was clear.

What is also clear is that a system which includes only a central server farm for the entire country (if not indeed the entire world) would be far less robust than one which also had distributed local servers as well.

Seems like that huge central farm would have a bullseye on it by hackers, if not terrorists.

[Mr. Blonde]

It isn’t ubiquity as much as ubiquity tied with simplicity. There are several (free) IM apps that work across platforms already. Many designed to mimic BBM as well. They all require some type of registration process and so forth. It is more drawn out, and not worth the trouble when you can just use SMS.

I can’t figure out why Google never released a native GTalk app for iPhone. That would have gone a long way toward accomplishing this in the US at least.

Still have a long way to go on ubiquity as well. I’m down to a precious few without a smartphone, but as it happens the most frequently texted is not on a smartphone yet. So that isn’t happening. I would also say whatever does away with SMS has to be cross platform because competition is here to stay.

[ReignOfError]

That’s been the problem: ubiquity. There’s enough iOS users to make transitioning from SMS easy; few others can provide that “everybody is doing it” base.

Smartphones have, pretty much from the beginning, had access to AIM, Google chat, Yahoo chat, etc. I had an AIM client on my Treo. The main advantage of SMS, as you point out, is ubiquity; the simplest "feature phone," as the kids are calling them these days, can do it.

I don't see iMessage as a direct challenge to SMS. I see it more as a feature-for-feature challenge to Blackberry Messenger, which is cited by a number of Blackberry users as a reason to stick with that platform. With receipts and encryption, iMessage eliminates one reason for individuals, and especially companies, to stick with Blackberry.

[Mr. Blonde]

I just learned that iMessage requires you to do absolutely nothing. That is nice for those who have to set up phones for less technologically adept friends and family. iMessage will just detect if it is communicating with another iOS device and if so use iMessage rather than SMS. Maybe y’all were aware of this, but I wasn’t. It definitely one ups everyone else in this regard big time even compared to BBM.