Biology teacher 'had sex with 16-year-old boy in her classroom'

Dailymail.U.K. ^ | 6/28/11 | John Stevens

[Recon Dad]

I would bet she brought it in for biology reasons.

[Arrowhead1952]

Twenty years ago you NEVER heard of this stuff happening.

I graduated in '69 and remember some of the football players bragging about doing it with a certain teacher in our HS. She moved to another school district after a couple of years.

[dirtymac]

I believe the problem with the Priest’s sexual misconduct was that they were f*cking young boys. Not even close to a 15 to 17 year old boy getting it on with a 27 year old female tacher. Still wrong but not nearly equivacal. Being a teacher also is not nearly the same level of expected trust as with a Priest. And there may not have been very many Priests actually f*cking young boys but all of the rest of the Priest new about it and covered it up for a long time.

[broken_arrow1]

Not even near Guilty!

[peeps36]

I turned 16 my freshmen year, or 9th grade. I was born in March and never stood back.

[tumblindice]

“alleged to have developed a close relationship”

“Teach, I’m almost 17 and I’m still in junior high. I don’t unnerstand all this mytosis and myosis and ... “

“You know the drill. Get on the couch and take your pants off.”

`Close relationship’. Are there any other countries that call a male chicken a `rooster’ because of what he does instead of what he is?

[Sporke]

Shame on all of you!!! All this talk about the teacher and I have not seen one post congratulating the victim!! :-D

[Emperor Palpatine]

Most definitely Not Guilty.

And where in the hell were these teachers when I was in school?

[mirkwood]

[Colofornian]

From the article: The 33-year-old was caught after a cleaner walked in on her and the student lying on a COUCH together in her classroom, it is reported...The pair allegedly had sex after watching a movie together after school on a COUCH in her classroom.

You all are missing the most obvious way that public schools are now officially sanctioning this kind of behavior: They're paying for and installing COUCHES right in the classrooms!

The students can just go direct from the on-campus health nurse or school-based clinic to get their free condoms, and head direct for the couches! All on taxpayers' expense! And look, they even get free on-the-clock demonstrations from educators on how to consistently and correctly use a condom!

And judging from the reaction of a number of male posters in this thread, they don't seemingly mind replicating this kind of sanctioning with their tax dollars across the country. I guess they want the taxpayer cash for clunker couches & condom program to keep on rockin'!

[Go Gordon]

I graduated in '69 and remember some of the football players bragging about doing it with a certain teacher in our HS.

I graduated in mathematics. I wish I could have majored in 69. You were lucky...

[Grunthor]

First of all, come down off the mountain, Moses. Second of all, we are all well aware of the fact that gender and looks matter far more in these cases than law and justice.

If this woman were ugly or if it were a male teacher/female student, a good long stretch in the pokey (no pun intended) would be the result and we all know that. Most of our comments are based in the irony that if the offender is a hot female, she will not get near the punishment that someone else would get.

Or perhaps you have never considered that possibility.

[Arrowhead1952]

They're paying for and installing COUCHES right in the classrooms!

The only place there were couches in our HS were in the principal and superintendent's offices and the teachers' lounges. I personally know several teachers and not one has a couch in their room.

[Lazamataz]

And judging from the reaction of a number of male posters in this thread, they don't seemingly mind replicating this kind of sanctioning with their tax dollars across the country

[Arrowhead1952]

I guess I should have posted 1969, instead of 69.

[count-your-change]

A couch, a t.v.? What kind of classroom is this?

“And judging from the reaction of a number of male posters in this thread, they don’t seemingly mind replicating this kind of sanctioning with their tax dollars across the country”

I guess it’s a big joke to them, “boys will be boys”, etc.

[Lazamataz]

First of all, come down off the mountain, Moses. Second of all, we are all well aware of the fact that gender and looks matter far more in these cases than law and justice. If this woman were ugly or if it were a male teacher/female student, a good long stretch in the pokey (no pun intended) would be the result and we all know that. Most of our comments are based in the irony that if the offender is a hot female, she will not get near the punishment that someone else would get. Or perhaps you have never considered that possibility.

No, actually, we seriously consider it impossible for a pretty schoolteacher to commit any crime against her students.

Particularly when the student is me.

And it's being filmed.

For a webcast where we charge money.

[houeto]

OMG I WOULD NEVER STOP HITTING IT

LMAO!

[JRios1968]

Giggety

[Lazamataz]

I guess it’s a big joke to them

This is deadly serious to us.

We want to go back to school where the entire staff are these women.

This is SERIOUS STUFF.