You all are missing the most obvious way that public schools are now officially sanctioning this kind of behavior: They're paying for and installing COUCHES right in the classrooms!
The students can just go direct from the on-campus health nurse or school-based clinic to get their free condoms, and head direct for the couches! All on taxpayers' expense! And look, they even get free on-the-clock demonstrations from educators on how to consistently and correctly use a condom!
And judging from the reaction of a number of male posters in this thread, they don't seemingly mind replicating this kind of sanctioning with their tax dollars across the country. I guess they want the taxpayer cash for clunker couches & condom program to keep on rockin'!
First of all, come down off the mountain, Moses. Second of all, we are all well aware of the fact that gender and looks matter far more in these cases than law and justice.
If this woman were ugly or if it were a male teacher/female student, a good long stretch in the pokey (no pun intended) would be the result and we all know that. Most of our comments are based in the irony that if the offender is a hot female, she will not get near the punishment that someone else would get.
Or perhaps you have never considered that possibility.
The only place there were couches in our HS were in the principal and superintendent's offices and the teachers' lounges. I personally know several teachers and not one has a couch in their room.
A couch, a t.v.? What kind of classroom is this?
“And judging from the reaction of a number of male posters in this thread, they don’t seemingly mind replicating this kind of sanctioning with their tax dollars across the country”
I guess it’s a big joke to them, “boys will be boys”, etc.
Okay...we’re making a a joke about a fairly serious situation. We understand that. We all know that she did something very wrong in nailing this under-age student.
It IS wrong. She SHOULD be punished to the fullest extent of the law. It is SAD that ANY teacher would take advantage of a student, male OR female.
That being said...I doubt seriously that we’ll be ceasing making said jokes anytime soon. It’s HUMOR...sometimes the only way to deal with the crap going on around us. Being serious all the time turns you into a sourpuss. ‘Nuff said.
All that is true. Personally I like couches in classrooms, as long as sex is banned but naps allowed. Public schools are NOT the proper place for sex ed. And sex ed used to be for the purposes of inspiring healthy in-marriage sex, that is LICENSED sex. License means a permit.
And also to explain the process of pregnancy and childbirth, so that the next generation could be created safely. And also to PROMOTE healthy marriage and respect for it. For within a marriage, a marriage of one man to one woman, strong, sane, healthy children to populate the next generation are produced, and the common human deficiencies of a man alone, or a woman alone, are best corrected. Marriage promotes sanity, good health, wealth, long-life. Without marriage, many individuals live more impoverished, unhealthy, less productive and shorter lives statistically speaking.
A society that encourages and respects marriage, that PROTECTS it, is a vibrant, healthy and long-lived society just for doing that.
Yes a society must be able to and is highly meritorious for banned all forms of unlicensed sex.
Those who cheer pretty sexy teachers “NOT GUILTY”, are male, for it is a male thing to celebrate such characteristics in a woman they see, but on the other hand they are not men. Men are adults, they understand the duty of a man to society and it’s proper functioning.
They are childish, animalistic. And not just Moses would say that, we can go down the list of great MEN in history and find that the great majority would not look too kindly on the excited public comments we see on these threads. It’s kind of like how misbehaved dogs hump poles and human legs.
It's kind of like rape - if we are going to get screwed anyway, we might as well relax and enjoy it