Good grief. I’m only stating what the prosecutor himself said. If the prosecutor hasn’t convinced himself how the ell can he convince a jury? When he makes conflicting statements it’s no wonder the jury saw no conviction.
The duct tape has received a lot of attention and discussion.
I would like to know if something has been overlooked.
Was it said in court by the prosecution exactly who put the tape on Caylee?
Was it a member of the Anthony household, or not? How would that be known?
Was it said when, where or under what circumstances the tape was applied?
Was the tape the cause of death? In what manner? Was the tape applied to a live Caylee, or a dead Caylee?
Some here think the tape was definitively placed on Caylee by Casey, and I would like to know why that is the only possible thought that should be entertained?
And if it was not proffered in court by the prosecution as to the role of the duct tape in the death of Caylee,and who applied it to her, how is the jury to decide that?
On the basis of what facts? Not theory. Facts.
There were four adults in the Anthony household. The tape, rather unique in its characteristics, was in the household.
It would be reasonable to assume that all could have had access to the duct tape in question at any time.
Which one put the tape on Caylee? Or was there a John Doe #5 that did it? What did the prosecution say? What was proven in court so that a reasonable doubt was not possible?