You know, once you made the argument that if you go to bed and wake up to fresh snow, although you did not see it snow, you can conclude it did—and you stated, no, it could have been trucks brought in filled with snow—I am only responding to you so that others of sound mind can get a glimpse into the kind of absurd reasoning the jurors must have engaged in.
The fake conversation slutmom claimed occurred with Caylee weeks after Caylee was killed is one more compelling piece of evidence against her. I do concede some of the evidence presented by the state did not impress me-—dogs alerting where no video was taken, and the trainer saying in essence “trust me, my dog alerted.”. But your response kind of indicates the general obtuseness of your thinking. It’s as though you cannot combine all of the proven facts and circumstances as a whole picture. You can’t see the forest as you attempt to dissect all of the csi type trees.
And you probably would never bring common sense into the equation. But for fun here’s an offer-—go to 5 used car lots, open 100 trunks and tell me if you find one unclean or badly stained. Common sense tells me dealers will do whatever it takes to detail a car thoroughly. To do otherwise is to work against yourself. So Lee lied about this one issue, or was wrong. Got a big stain or a bag of garbage in your trunk?
There are classes you can take in logic. There used to be, and probably still is, a game called wffnproof that teaches logic, so it can be a learned skill.
“No one makes an accident look like a murder” such a simple concept but beyond the common sense of this jury. I would be curious about the life choices of people lacking the common sense gene, like the jury and you.
LOL My wife warned me that by playing with your head you’d probably take it serious and go bonkers. My first thought had been to explain that we live so far south that if there was that much snow on the ground there is no way unless the earth had switched axis. You see, I don’t take you seriously. The jury spent 44 hours in the courtroom and was focused on this case for weeks and weeks. Then they were instructed on what legal grounds they could come to a verdict. It’s preposterous to think that we could come to a conclusion in the same way they did.
>>“No one makes an accident look like a murder”<<
Unless someone is trying to make it look like murder to cover for someone else. Casey took Caylee with her to friends and left them in the care of them while she went and partied. The room mate of her boyfriend was one of those. Why do you assume Casey did it rather then one of those friends? The body was then put in the trunk and George helped after realizing that Casey had not reported it to protect her.
You see. I can speculate just as you can. The difference is that you speculate that she did it for sure and the jury and others of us say the prosecution didn’t prove that.