Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid
I looked through the presentation, and it is not very clear on the chain of evidence. For example, he takes an image (Exhibit 1) and then makes it 202% larger, removes color and rotates by a couple of degrees. Then the produced image matches the one that Obama published. This is fine.

However it's not clear where that Exhibit 1 comes from, aside from claims that he made that image himself. Does he have any historical records, like timestamped or archived emails, or something, that proves the origin of this Exhibit 1? This is a valid question; you know what they say about extraordinary claims.

IMO, the battle for the BC has been lost long ago, for many reasons. Not enough people in this minimally enlightened democracy give a rat's behind about legality of anything that happens in the government. This includes the legality of the President and unconstitutional laws made by Congress and supported by the judiciary. The populace just doesn't care. Many people simply don't have the intellectual capacity to understand any of that (but their right to vote is sacred.)

At this point Obama can be defeated only by his own policies - and he does everything in his power to defeat himself. He might be a "disposable President" who is installed for one term to do a specific task, no holds barred, and then he is set aside. Obama doesn't really like governing anyway.

28 posted on 08/09/2011 7:12:56 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Greysard
Does he have any historical records, like timestamped or archived emails, or something, that proves the origin of this Exhibit 1?

You betcha!
34 posted on 08/09/2011 7:31:03 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Greysard
IMO, the battle for the BC has been lost long ago, for many reasons. Not enough people in this minimally enlightened democracy give a rat's behind about legality of anything that happens in the government. This includes the legality of the President and unconstitutional laws made by Congress and supported by the judiciary. The populace just doesn't care. Many people simply don't have the intellectual capacity to understand any of that (but their right to vote is sacred.)

At this point Obama can be defeated only by his own policies - and he does everything in his power to defeat himself. He might be a "disposable President" who is installed for one term to do a specific task, no holds barred, and then he is set aside. Obama doesn't really like governing anyway.

This is the most reasonable argument I have heard as to why the birth certificate/eligibility issue might be not worth pursuing. If others had the intellectual perspicacity and civil grace to make such an argument, they would not be mistaken for Obama sympathizers or Obot Trolls.

I respect this argument, but I do not completely agree with it. I regard it as our job and duty to educated the ignorant public, and to spread the meme of Obama's illegitimacy. If the Nation crashes as I am horrified that it might, it is important for people to view Obama as a negative example of violating the Article II requirements. At least he would then serve some useful purpose.

128 posted on 08/10/2011 8:44:57 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Abortion is Murder and Democrats are Stupid and/or Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Greysard
He might be a "disposable President" who is installed for one term to do a specific task, no holds barred, and then he is set aside.

Wow. Your excellent point here is typical Democrat scheming of the racist variety since the Civil War. And so who do they choose to bring down the country? Who do they choose to trample the Constitution? Who do they choose who will have the worst presidential reputation in history? Reminds me of the despicable line in Godfather I......

Don Zaluchi: "....we would keep the traffic in the dark people, the coloreds. They're animals anyway, so let them lose their souls."

If it ever comes out that the Democrats purposely chose a Black to do their dirty work, THEN, my friends, then we'll see riots....and I wouldn't want to be a Democrat when that happens.

213 posted on 08/10/2011 8:42:40 PM PDT by CanaGuy (P.M. Steven Harper: We gave you a majority, now get busy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson