If I have it right then the virus 'opens the door' that the bacteria comes in through. Don't know if it's ever the other way around.
1 posted on
09/19/2011 12:37:14 PM PDT by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv; neverdem; DvdMom; grey_whiskers; Ladysmith; Roos_Girl; Silentgypsy; conservative cat; ...
2 posted on
09/19/2011 12:38:35 PM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
“...the 2009 pandemic influenza virus.”
What pandemic? I don’t remember any pandemic in 2009; does anyone else?
4 posted on
09/19/2011 12:50:02 PM PDT by
SatinDoll
(NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
To: decimon
The clinical disease and tissue damage seen in the pre-pandemic cases were indistinguishable from those evident in cases that occurred during the height of the pandemic. This suggests, says Dr. Taubenberger, that over the course of the pandemic, the virus did not undergo a dramatic change that could explain the unusually high mortality it ultimately caused. Or that it already had. In any case, there are two hypotheses of which I'm aware at the moment: first, that the influenza virus compromised the immune system sufficiently to allow for widespread death by secondary (bacterial) infection, and second, that the virus caused a catastrophic immune cascade that ended up killing the patient by itself. I think we'd need more tissue samples than we have to demonstrate which it was, and it could have been both.
To: decimon
Great-grandma’s brother was a soldier who survived WWI only to be cut down by the Spanish flu on the way home.
18 posted on
09/19/2011 4:11:03 PM PDT by
Free Vulcan
(Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
To: decimon
24 posted on
09/19/2011 9:12:56 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson