Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's 2012 theme : blame corporations for unemployment
Myself | 10.16.2011 | Me

Posted on 10/16/2011 3:09:02 PM PDT by libh8er

Edited on 10/16/2011 3:15:29 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

At first I thought the fleabaggers were just leftist radicals protesting capitalism. But as I am looking at youtube videos from across the country and now the world, a good chunk of them are just unemployeds who are blaming corporations for not hiring them. This is exactly what the regime wants. Blaming Bush has run its course, blaming Congress has had limited success, so now why not blame corporations directly for not hiring. Wall Street is just the figurehead representing corporations. So this is Obama's last line of defense for his failure. He tried everything - from stimulating the economy with trillions to trying to cut deals with mean Republicans.. but in the end it's greedy corporations don't want to hire because they want to fatten their profits. Vote Obama in 2012 and he will take it to the corporations. This will be the theme heading into 2012.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: election2012; obamanation; occupywallstreet; zero

1 posted on 10/16/2011 3:09:07 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libh8er
blame corporations for unemployment

Why, because government although stone cold broke from pi$$ing hard earned labor away still employs people at exorbitant wages even though the money isn't there to pay them?

2 posted on 10/16/2011 3:12:03 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

3 posted on 10/16/2011 3:12:20 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Yep. Obammy just said that Wall Street is the problem and we need a new system to bring the criminals to justice.


4 posted on 10/16/2011 3:16:27 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

True story: Some friends of ours own a food service franchise. As a husband and wife team, they have invested their life savings.

The corporation takes a 9% cut. Internet ‘call ahead’ ordering takes 14% on every order. Buy one get one and other coupons are loss leaders for them.

In the last two years, year-over-year profits have declined 20% each year. At the same time, the prices for raw goods/foodstuffs have gone up 20% the last year alone.

This is a major, well known ‘chain’ franchise that most folks know. These people, working together, make roughly $50K and are working themselves into the ground.


5 posted on 10/16/2011 3:18:16 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Who passed NAFTA? Bill Clinton. Who extended permanent most favored nation status to China? Bill Clinton. Who compelled banks to give loans to unqualified borrowers? Bill Clinton? Whose really to blame for the circumstances we currently find ourselves in?


6 posted on 10/16/2011 3:19:50 PM PDT by RC one (Voting isn't a simple act of civic duty anymore, it's a complex act of civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er
I saw the "Occupy Wall Street' demonstrations as a diversionary tactic for Obama's failures from the git-go. That';s why the Democrat p0oliticians were so eager to embrace the protestors. The meme is that the rotten economy isn't Obama's fault. Nooooo, it's those 'greedy Wall Street bankers', yup, yup. In fact, it was the Frank-Dodd collusion to force banks to issue mortgages to unqualified buyers that started the whole mess, but you'll never hear that from the MSM, much less, any Democrat politician railing about 'corporate greed' while taking as much loot for his campaign as he can get from those same 'greedy bankers'.

The mobs are clueless and mostly just want whatever they think they can get from those who have more than they do, for whatever reason. This is the inevitable result of Obama's class warfare strategy and it may blow up in his face once the dupes figure out that he is playing them. Then again, because so many of them are so freaking clueless, they may never figure it out. However, if these 'protests' turn violent and start disrupting too many citizens daily lives, the whole thing could backfire on Obama and the left, big-time. That would be cosmic justice.

7 posted on 10/16/2011 3:23:16 PM PDT by Jim Scott (on the 'Cain Train')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Much more economical for them to just file a patent and open a po box in Zug, Switzerland.

Then open more factories in communist countries.


8 posted on 10/16/2011 3:39:32 PM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

Right now its 1968 lets make sure its not 1917?


9 posted on 10/16/2011 3:43:01 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RC one

” Who compelled banks to give loans to unqualified borrowers? Bill Clinton? “ <<<<

Where is the RNC bundle money going toward getting this fact out, as Obama is claiming that it was the Republicans who got us into this and their failed policy we will return to if they win. GWB never bothered to mention the Clinton trade off to China of American freedoms, or the perennial buying of black votes with unqualified borrowing privileges. Fannie and Freddie started this, willingly destroying the nation, all for votes. I promise you Dana Perino never bothers to mention this trail of terror by the Clintons. This is how truth and history is lost. Doubt the furry collective down on Wall Street protesting even know the roots of Marxism has borne its curse by way of the Clintons.


10 posted on 10/16/2011 3:53:52 PM PDT by RitaOK (TEXAS. It's EXHIBIT A for Rick, who needs to pound the fiction flackers back into the Stone Age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

In 2012 Americans will be able to fire Barack Hussein Obama. Who then will he blame for his own unemployment?


11 posted on 10/16/2011 4:12:57 PM PDT by a fool in paradise ('Are now or have you ever been a member of the tea party?' is NOT a legitimate debate question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I think he’s got a decent shot at becoming Prez of Kenya.

Either that or do a show on MSNBC from Cuba.

But I’m pretty sure he’s gonna be deported in 2013.


12 posted on 10/16/2011 4:20:06 PM PDT by nascarnation (DEFEAT BARAQ 2012 DEPORT BARAQ 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

13 posted on 10/16/2011 4:34:32 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (o)(o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

At Least You Can Count On FR

The Best Conservative Site On The Web


Click The Pic To Donate

14 posted on 10/16/2011 4:36:58 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Per Drudge, WH is supporting the OWS. I am very glad for two reasons. First it will teach Wall Street bankers that there is a consequence for screwing with people and think gov will bail them out or protect them. Second NYC Wall Street bankers (whom half are Jewish) thought they can keep allying with the Dem Party and ignore its left wing fringe. Guess what the left wing fringe took to the streets and want to ship them to Israel. Bankers and their families for the first time will be threaten by these Dem left wing fringe. Worst the moderates in the Dem party cannot do anything about it.
2012 will be a watershed year for US political terrain. If the GOP plays their card correctly, Dems may lose support from NYC Wall Street bankers (and bankers from other major financial center cities) for many years to come. This will not only cripple the extreme liberal Dem candidates but also the moderate Dem candidates.


15 posted on 10/16/2011 4:52:17 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er
The King Obama’s communists are way ahead of the lame GOP who are always on the defense.
16 posted on 10/16/2011 5:07:45 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

And if business were better, your friends would hire employees, I’m sure. Or add to the hired help if they have any employees as of now.

This points up how little people really understand about business. How many realize that major chain franchise businesses pay royalties to “Corporate”? Or have to pay a share of chain advertising expenses? Or the rent expense, expenses of paying people, paying the electric bill, etc???

Face it, if it was that easy to make money running a business, everybody would have their own business.


17 posted on 10/16/2011 7:08:01 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson