Posted on 12/12/2011 2:33:10 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Good news. The talented strategists left the UNFCCC team before COP17 in Durban. The A-graders saw the trainwreck coming and moved on.
Everyone knows its a herculean task to get 190-odd countries to sign anything, and with a typical pragmatical approach the UN drafting team have gone for not just a new International Court (crikey!) but rights for Mother Earth (can we be sued by a rock?), and oh boy, the holy grail, the whole kit and caboodle we demand Peace On Earth, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree, as Part 47a, and starting by morning tea tomorrow.
Monckton reports that the funereal collapsing Durban talks still held the highest of ambitions. Godlike even. The real action behind the posters of parrots and pleas to save pygmy corals, or spotted limpets is the plea to make some unelected bureaucrats the totalitarian Kings of The World.
In part its chilling, a New International Court which could presumably try you for crimes against coastlines, clouds, or (more likely) against endangered windfarms. Those with their hands on the legal wheel want the power to direct money (was that $1.6 Trillion?) from the richest nations to their friends, patrons, or pet causes. If they became the anointed Kings, it would swiftly become a crime to speak doubts of climate models upon which billions of trades depends. The darkest evil always comes cloaked with helpful intentions.
Fortunately, whats left of the UN strategic team is even lower caliber than B-grade, beyond Z, somewhere into hexadecimal.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the grown-ups in the IPCC-support-team left the party sometime after Copenhagen, and the Z++ team are left to guard the bones. No one can take this wild ambit claim seriously.
Of course, at the 28th hour of extended play they had to announce something landmark and thus they did. All you need to know about their success is written in the following paragraph:
The deal doesnt explicitly compel any nation to take on emissions targets, although most emerging economies have volunteered to curb the growth of their emissions.
Thats the good news. The bad news is they still got our money:
Sundays deal also set up the bodies that will collect, govern and distribute tens of billions of dollars a year for poor countries. Other documents in the package lay out rules for monitoring and verifying emissions reductions, protecting forests, transferring clean technologies to developing countries and scores of technical issues.
Source [Assoc Press]
The reports from green observers offer us much insight:
Environmentalists criticized the package as did many developing countries in the debate for failing to address what they called the most urgent issue, to move faster and deeper in cutting carbon emissions.
The good news is we avoided a train wreck, said Alden Meyer, recalling predictions a few days ago of a likely failure. The bad news is that we did very little here to affect the emissions curve.
But then it was never about emissions, was it?
Behind the scenes, throughout the year since Cancun, the now-permanent bureaucrats who have made highly-profitable careers out of what they lovingly call the process have been beavering away at what is now a 138-page document. Its catchy title is Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention Update of the amalgamation of draft texts in preparation of [one imagines they mean 'for'] a comprehensive and balanced outcome to be presented to the Conference of the Parties for adoption at its seventeenth session: note by the Chair. In plain English, these are the conclusions the bureaucracy wants.
The contents of this document, turgidly drafted with all the UNs skill at what the former head of its documentation center used to call transparent impenetrability, are not just off the wall they are lunatic.
Main points:
- Ø A new International Climate Court will have the power to compel Western nations to pay ever-larger sums to third-world countries in the name of making reparation for supposed climate debt. The Court will have no power over third-world countries. Here and throughout the draft, the West is the sole target. The process is now irredeemably anti-Western.
- Ø Rights of Mother Earth: The draft, which seems to have been written by feeble-minded green activists and environmental extremists, talks of The recognition and defence of the rights of Mother Earth to ensure harmony between humanity and nature. Also, there will be no commodification [whatever that may be: it is not in the dictionary and does not deserve to be] of the functions of nature, therefore no carbon market will be developed with that purpose.
- Ø Right to survive: The draft childishly asserts that The rights of some Parties to survive are threatened by the adverse impacts of climate change, including sea level rise. At 2 inches per century, according to eight years data from the Envisat satellite? Oh, come off it! The Jason 2 satellite, the new kid on the block, shows that sea-level has actually dropped over the past three years.
- Ø War and the maintenance of defence forces and equipment are to cease just like that because they contribute to climate change. There are other reasons why war ought to cease, but the draft does not mention them.
Read it all at Climate Depot .
h/t to Tom Nelson
In comments John Brookes reports that the ABC are taking of a legally binding agreement for 2020.
Maybe he means this (or something like it)?
My thoughts (from the comments).
Not much.
Imagine what kind of legally binding agreement people would sign in 2011 that legally binds them to a document that does not exist but will by 2020? That would be a blank cheque. I agree to buy your house in 2020 for an unknown sum.
If they had signed a legally binding document to set up an emissions trading scheme in 2020 theyd have starting prices, supply, demand, markets, rules, whos in, whos out, etc etc etc. They dont. Theyve signed a legally binding document to come to a meeting before 2020 and sort out all the details them. In other words, this landmark deal may amount to not much more than a COP18, COP19, COP20
. Of course, it will still cost lots of money, and thousands of children will die of preventable diseases who could have been saved if the UN shut down the UNFCCC and used the money differently.
fyi
So, basically what they agreed to do is keep their expensive bureaucracy and have another conference in another nice location?
We get a special court.
Funny, that doesn’t make me feel “special.”
Things don’t seem to be going well according to their plan..... :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.