Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Look at Kepler SETI Candidate Signals
UC Berkeley ^

Posted on 01/05/2012 9:20:42 PM PST by LibWhacker

We've started searching our Kepler SETI observations and our analyses have generated some of our first candidate signals. Each of the signals below is shown in a pair of plots, one from an observation of Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) 817 and one from an observation of KOI-812. During an observation, we alternated between targets to enable us to rule out signals seen coming from two different places in the sky. If we see a signal coming from multiple positions on the sky, it is very likely to be interference.

What do these plots represent?

These are plots of electromagnetic energy as a function of frequency and time. Brighter colors represent more radio energy at a particular time and frequency. For example, a radio station transmitting at 101.5 MHz would produce a large amount of energy near that frequency.

Why are these signals interesting?

These signals look similar to what we think might be produced from an extraterrestrial technology. They are narrow in frequency, much narrower than would be produced by any known astrophysical phenomena, and they drift in frequency with time, as we would expect because of the doppler effect imposed by the relative motion of the transmitter and the receiving radio telescope.










Download all 12 candidate signals in a .pdf file.



TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: candidate; kepler; seti; signals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: garjog

Very cool images.


21 posted on 01/06/2012 5:18:13 AM PST by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

SETI is fun to watch on your computer as it crunches actual data.


22 posted on 01/06/2012 6:01:26 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; Quix

Reading the source article, it differs WILDLY in the conclusion, namely, the source article states emphatically that these are all radio interference from earthly sources, not in any way ET in origin. Why the editing for the post?


23 posted on 01/06/2012 3:20:18 PM PST by Liberty Tree Surgeon (Mow your own lawn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Tree Surgeon

The editing was on their end. I posted the article exactly as it appeared on their website. Yeah, it was not written very well. They admit that. It confused a lot of people, me included (sorry).


24 posted on 01/06/2012 5:53:26 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

My sincere apologies!


25 posted on 01/06/2012 7:39:23 PM PST by Liberty Tree Surgeon (Mow your own lawn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson