[ApplegateRanch]

Australoids are distinct from Mongoloids,distinct from Negroids, distinct from Caucasoids. All are human but what triggered the many from one type?

Instinctively, that argument against makes sense; and it is satisfying emotionally.

OTOH, in a hugely shorter time span, we've demonstrably gone from

to

[Boogieman]

That comparison offers us nothing of real value. Man is supposed to have differentiated through the blind agent of natural selection, while domesticated animals have been differentiated purposefully by man.

There’s a better argument to be made, from looking at the vast morphological differences we’ve bred into dogs and similar animals. If evolutionists were to dig up fossils of domestic dogs a million years from now, they would classify them into a multitude of separate species, based soley on superficial differences in morphology, but of course we know they are all the same species and this variation is entirely the result of a short period of selective breeding. That is evidence that weighs against the standard methodology of that evolutionary biologists have been practicing to support their “science”.