Skip to comments.
Was Breitbart LEGALLY Assassinated?
vanity
| 3/4/12
| null and void
Posted on 03/04/2012 8:28:17 AM PST by null and void
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 281-287 next last
To: null and void
Laws are like sausages; you know the rest. Laws are structured to control the little people and many of them aren't legal. So, no, Breitbart could no have been murdered legally.
He may have died naturally BUT it is highly doubtful for two reasons:
1) The natural causes determination came out ridiculously fast.
2) All celebrity autopsies are complete and reported within 24 hours. The report is either the final determination or that toxicology reports have to come back before determination.
They've learned a lot since Vince Foster, just not enough.
81
posted on
03/04/2012 9:43:47 AM PST
by
Lady Jag
(Laws are spider webs through which the big flies pass and the little ones get caught)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
No.Much as I would love to see such a conspiracy exposed, Andrew's heart was a ticking time bomb.
And it detonated.
Exactly. This is the most likely cause of death.
To: Jacquerie; COUNTrecount
I have never heard reference to security details for the Marxist mouthpieces bent on our destruction.
Ever heard of ACORN, SEIU, AFL-CIO and other union thugs/goons?
To: null and void
What is missing from most commentaries on the subject of Breitbart's death/assassination is this: when a conspiracy theory seems not only plausible, but highly likely because of the current political environment, then the nation is at least only a step away from the theory being a reality.
Who does doubts that the current executive branch has no moral scruples in killing Andrew Breitbart? Who doubts that the media would just yawn if it were privately known by them? They would likely justify it as "a necessary evil to save the country from right-wingers who want to destroy Amerika."
We are there. No one cares that the son of a Kenyan is the ineligible, why would they care if his people did things the Chicago way on Andrew Breitbart? The truth will never be known, because no one wants to publicly admit it.
84
posted on
03/04/2012 9:51:39 AM PST
by
Tzfat
To: PuzzledInTX
wasnt there a Freeper killed while on FR from Houston, TX (look over shoulder) a while back.
85
posted on
03/04/2012 9:53:40 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Simple: Kill the terrorists, Protect (all) the borders, ridicule all the (surviving) Liberals :^)
To: null and void
86
posted on
03/04/2012 9:56:55 AM PST
by
InvisibleChurch
( go in peace , serve the Lord)
To: Longbow1969
Obama planned for this contingency long ago. His supporters run the medical examiner’s office - the autopsy will be a fraud. The conspiracy is vast and deep. /tinfoil hat=off>
To: skinkinthegrass
wasnt there a Freeper killed while on FR from Houston, TX (look over shoulder) a while back. Chief Negotiator
88
posted on
03/04/2012 10:01:59 AM PST
by
null and void
(Day 1138 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
To: Jim from C-Town
“He was not assassinated and any talk of that does a disservice to him and his adversaries.”
How so?
89
posted on
03/04/2012 10:03:49 AM PST
by
ElayneJ
To: ElayneJ
It lowers and corsens the discussion. It is akin to calling your adversary a Nazi. It is also pure conjecture.
90
posted on
03/04/2012 10:07:20 AM PST
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: null and void
The mind of the progressive operates like a ship without an anchor. Moral and metaphysical relativism.
Committing an error which is both moral and intellectual, the progressive has preferred to look away from his comprehension of the existence of transcendent rules.
This is why it doesn’t matter that while in certain respects the current administration has not upheld its oath to the U.S. Constitution, yet it can pretend agreement with it in others.
91
posted on
03/04/2012 10:12:40 AM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, R. Zacharias, Erwin Lutzer, and others.)
To: Jim from C-Town; ElayneJ
I'll tell you what I told someone else.
I see by your sign up that you weren't here during Clinton. Your head would have exploded.
The reality is that we are being taken over by rich and powerful marxists (like Soros). And you want to pretend that they don't play rough. Or have access to things like this. You'd be wrong.
92
posted on
03/04/2012 10:13:54 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
To: null and void
I hope a autopsy reveals no wrong doing. But, tin foil hat or not conspiracy theory. The thought has crossed my mind that some on the left will stoop to anything, to include assassination.
93
posted on
03/04/2012 10:15:54 AM PST
by
Sea Parrot
(You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something. --Stephen Adam)
To: null and void
Thxs, that's what iirc.. n&v :-/
they never solved that murder..
read its been coldcased.
94
posted on
03/04/2012 10:16:34 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Simple: Kill the terrorists, Protect (all) the borders, ridicule all the (surviving) Liberals :^)
To: Jim from C-Town
“It lowers and corsens the discussion. It is akin to calling your adversary a Nazi. It is also pure conjecture.”
OK - That’s interesting. What is the discussion that’s being corsened? AB is dead. What discussion should we be having? I always find this kind of argument fascinating. Do you remember Vince Foster? There certainly were questions surrounding his death. Why would his friends, loved ones, and admirers be content with a park ranger’s report of cause of death? If my loved one died unexpectedly, I’d want to know every single thing I could about it. Why was that not the case for VF? Same here. If there’s anything amiss in AB’s death, why should we not want to know?
It’s akin to calling our opponents nazis? Seriously? Again, how?
95
posted on
03/04/2012 10:19:18 AM PST
by
ElayneJ
To: DJ MacWoW
RIP. But it is a bit odd.
96
posted on
03/04/2012 10:19:36 AM PST
by
hal ogen
(1st Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: null and void
Was Breitbart LEGALLY Assassinated?
vanity | 3/4/12 | null and void
"
Conspiracy theories are the ..." see tag line ...
97
posted on
03/04/2012 10:20:30 AM PST
by
_Jim
(Conspiracy theories are the favorite tools of the weak-minded.)
To: FightThePower!
"Interesting the media was claiming his death was of natural causes before an autopsy was conducted."Gee, could it have been that his wife and family released a statement that indicated 'natural causes'?
Do you really think that the WH had him killed and then contacted the media, instructing them to say 'natural causes'? Sheesh.
98
posted on
03/04/2012 10:22:32 AM PST
by
JustaDumbBlonde
(Don't wish doom on your enemies ... plan it.)
To: _Jim
99
posted on
03/04/2012 10:22:53 AM PST
by
null and void
(Day 1138 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
To: dirtboy
>"Breitbart was actually struck by a remnant fragment from comet Elenin."So, natural causes then.
100
posted on
03/04/2012 10:24:25 AM PST
by
rawcatslyentist
(BO Stinks! Like Mitts magic underwear!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 281-287 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson