Posted on 05/07/2012 3:17:32 PM PDT by tpanther
SCIENCE NOW KNOWS THAT MANY OF THE PILLARS OF DARWINIAN THEORY ARE EITHER FALSE OR MISLEADING. YET BIOLOGY TEXTS CONTINUE TO PRESENT THEM AS FACTUAL EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION. WHAT DOES THIS IMPLY ABOUT THEIR SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS?
(Excerpt) Read more at discovery.org ...
He’s a Moony and he’s loony.
Turn off the caps lock if you want anyone to take you seriously
Read and understand the following if you want me to take you seriously; personally, I don’t care if you do.
http://vwxynot.blogspot.com/2007/06/endogenous-retroviruses-and-evidence.html
In fact, when the false “evidence” is
taken away, the case for Darwinian evolution, in the textbooks
at least, is so thin it’s almost invisible.
Didn’t put on caps lock...once you read, you’ll understand. That was how it was in the article.
Great. A shouty Moonie, that’s all we need.
I read a good bit of the article...it presupposes that evolution is true, and then goes on to say why, by supplying “evidence”.
It takes a jab at creationists and throws in that’s not science.
The point of MY article is, neither is evolution.
Then there’s my tagline.
Reading continues to remain fundamental.
Not fun and mental.
But anything to ignore the gargantuan thin-ness. ;)
Some of us haven’t evolved ears yet.
LOL...and too many think ears will eventually evolve to the point we can read with them.
The article your link took me to was not in caps.
Evolution is one of Gods' more ingenious creations allowing his creatures to adapt and evolve to suit the universe he created for them.
Thanks, God, well-played!
Supplying evidence to demonstrate the truth of something is how science is one. Asserting the contrary with nothing but capital letters is not how science is done.
Who is this "Science" person? Can we question him/her?
Well, yes and no. That lede was done in “Small Caps” font embellishment.
You know, this is very true, but if you bring up this argument with pro-Evos, they say that no scientists believe in that evidence, and they don’t base their theories on it. They just blame the shoddy textbook manufacturers for perpetuating these errors.
I wonder why nobody from the pro-Evo crowd ever gets concerned with correcting the textbooks that are miseducating children about their theory? Are they worried that their “real” evidence will be less compelling than the “fake” evidence? If not, then what is a more plausible explanation for their lacadaisical attitude?
How science is one?
Or perhaps you meant won? LOL
Well by all means, let us know when you might have something to add!
Liberals are like that.
They just kinda shrug their shoulders and say something like...well I didn’t plant it there or whatever.
Yeah...the “real” stuff probably is just as damaging and also notice how liberals are always making rules for others to follow that they never ever have any intention of keeping themselves. They’re constantly doing that with anything that dares to challenge their beloved evolution.
The more I’m around this, the more I’m convinced evos are liberals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.