Anti-Keynesian Supply Side Tax and Spending Cuts in Sweden, and the Finance Minister Behind It

Carpe Diem ^ | 05/09/2012 | Mark J. Perry

[SeekAndFind]

From the U.K. Spectator's report on the amazing success of supply-side economics in Sweden, and finance minister Anders Borg, the man behind it:

"When Europe’s finance ministers meet for a group photo, it’s easy to spot the rebel — Anders Borg (pictured above) has a ponytail and earring. What actually marks him out, though, is how he responded to the crash. While most countries in Europe borrowed massively, Borg did not. Since becoming Sweden’s finance minister, his mission has been to pare back government. His ‘stimulus’ was a permanent tax cut. To critics, this was fiscal lunacy. Borg, on the other hand, thought lunacy meant repeating the economics of the 1970s and expecting a different result.

Three years on, it’s pretty clear who was right. "Look at Spain, Portugal or the UK, whose governments were arguing for large temporary stimulus," he says. "Well, we can see that very little of the stimulus went to the economy. But they are stuck with the debt." Tax-cutting Sweden, by contrast, had the fastest growth in Europe last year, when it also celebrated the abolition of its deficit. The recovery started just in time for the 2010 Swedish election, in which the Conservatives were re-elected for the first time in history.

All this has taken Borg from curiosity to celebrity. The Financial Times recently declared him the most effective finance minister in Europe.

"Everybody was told 'stimulus, stimulus, stimulus'," he says — referring to the EU, IMF and the alphabet soup of agencies urging a global, debt-fueled spending splurge. Borg, an economist, couldn’t work out how this would help. "It was surprising that Europe, given what we experienced in the 1970s and 80s with structural unemployment, believed that short-term Keynesianism could solve the problem." Non-economists, he says, "might have a tendency to fall for those kinds of messages."

He continued to cut taxes and cut welfare-spending to pay for it; he even cut property taxes for the rich to lure entrepreneurs back to Sweden. The last bit was the most unpopular, but for Borg, economic recovery starts with entrepreneurs. If cutting taxes for the rich encouraged risk-taking, then it had to be done. "In most cases, the company would not have been created without the owner," he says. "There would be no Ikea without [Ingvar] Kamprad. We would not have Tetra-Pak without [Ruben] Rausing. They are probably the foremost entrepreneurs we have had in the last few decades, and both moved out of Sweden."

But they were not rich, I say, when they were starting out. "No, but they were becoming rich. If you have a high wealth tax and an inheritance tax, people emigrate because it becomes too costly to own a company. Ownership is a production factor. Entrepreneurs are a production factor. Yes, these people are rich and you can obviously argue that we want to encourage social cohesion. But it is also problematic if you drive out entrepreneurs from your country, because they are the source of job creation."

Update: The chart below displays constant dollar GDP growth rates for Sweden vs. the U.S. from 2002 to 2011, and shows that Sweden's economy has outperformed the U.S. economy over the last ten years by 0.8% per year on average (OECD data here).  Over the last two years (2010 and 2011), Sweden's real GDP growth has averaged 5%, or more than twice the U.S. average of 2.35%, and provides evidence that Sweden's supply-side approach to the 2007-2009 recession has been more successful than the demand-side Keynesian approach in the U.S.

[SeekAndFind]

[Maceman]

In May 2002, Reuters reported on a survey conducted by the Swedish Research Institute of Trade, known in Sweden by the acronym HUI. According to the article:

Swedes, usually perceived in Europe as a comfortable, middle class lot, are poorer than African Americans, the most economically-deprived group in the United States

"Black people, who have the lowest income in the United States, now have a higher standard of living than an ordinary Swedish household," the HUI economists said.

If Sweden were a U.S. state, it would be the poorest, measured by household gross income before taxes, [the report authors]said.

[Erasmus]

Non-economists, he says, "might have a tendency to fall for those kinds of messages."

And also not a few blokes with economics degrees hanging on their walls, who successfully tout themselves as "economists."

[Excellence]

So resistance isn’t futile after all!

[Erasmus]

"There would be no Ikea without [Ingvar] Kamprad."

Whose companies are an interlocking maze and are HQ'd in Holland, largely to minimize his taxes.

[SeekAndFind]

One thing this article you shared does not mention is this — SWEDES ARE RELATIVELY A HOMOGENEOUS PEOPLE ( WHITE ). They share a culture which is historically informed by Lutheran values.

I will concede that this culture is slowly ebbing away (immigration from Muslim countries being a factor ) and Lutheran values are slowly being replaced by secular ones, but by and large, they are still relatively intact.

So, inspite of the fact that they do not make as much as blacks in the USA, THEY DO NOT HAVE THE SAME CRIME RATES AS BLACKS. At least not yet.

[Mack the knife]

So, inspite of the fact that they do not make as much as blacks in the USA, THEY DO NOT HAVE THE SAME CRIME RATES AS BLACKS. At least not yet.

---

Haven’t you heard of the city of Malmo? It is a Muslim enclave, requiring police to escort firemen.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Haven’t you heard of the city of Malmo? It is a Muslim enclave, requiring police to escort firemen.

________________________________

That is why I added this sentence in my post:

“I will concede that this culture is slowly ebbing away (immigration from Muslim countries being a factor )”

The Swedes were doing very well in terms of peace and order (compared to blacks in the USA) until they decided to go the way of the rest of Europe and accept immigrants who have NO PLANS of assimilating.