Posted on 07/04/2012 1:16:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Unless you or the Mods can find some specific rules I have broken or find a quote I posted that disparaged this site, you reckon I could have my posting privileges returned?
Didn’t read the whole thing but ~WOW~ that guy Quix has issues.
Amen to that!!
I live in Grants Pass and K-Falls is also in Southern Oregon. Jeff’s reporting on that whole attempted travesty was exceptional!
He is truly an American Hero.
Ed
Our conversation was calm and uneventful. *shrugging*
You’re confusing a teachings/doctrines from an organization/institution -versus- a “person”. They are two completely different things.
Your posts to DJ are looking mighty like badgering.
"I never saw the claim of him being a psychologist. "
I think we can be pardoned for interpreting your statement to mean that you never observed or read any posts in which he asserted that he was a psychologist.
I see that Quix has been slow to respond?!
Yes, they are, aren’t they.
There’s a certain troll site with an unhealthy obssession over certain posters here.
Hmm...
quix and quidam have both left the building.
You’re quite welcome.
But if I do that, won’t I share responsibility for all the avaccu-sucked and dismembered babies that he legislated? Won’t I be sharing responsibility for helping solidify a homosexualized military? Won’t I be directly ensuring that all our kids get taught the best way to insert strange things and various body extremities in their friends...you know... ‘places’?
I know that some here think that forcing all this stuff on us is a conservative thing to do. Because that’s what their vote for it proves they do, regardless of all the spin to the contrary. But I FEELLLLLL bad about thinking that way. I WAAAANNNNTTT to be guilt free and go along with all the other liberals. I FEEEELLLLL I should be able to say whatever I want about anything and have it magically become true!
But something holds me back. I guess I’m ‘Questioning’. Does that make me a bad man?
I am so conflicted.... Why can’t I help kill children and FEEEELLLLL good about it too?!?!?!?
It’s not FAIRRRRR!!!!!
Terribly so!
Monsters in the noggins, hiding under beds and scaring children in the night a-la the bogieman.
Or you’d think so to hear them tell it.
And everyone moved over to the "new" site. Different location, same anti-freepers.
Sorry but your information is incorrect. This ‘new’ site is not anti-FReeper it just has some disgruntled ex-FReepers.
No. My info is straight from TBL. You can try to dress it up but it's still "lipstick on a pig" time.
That board started as an anti-freep board and they are STILL contacting posters and trying to damage FR. They don't hide it. You don't see it because you don't participate.
If Romney won in a landslide, you and I and every Republican and even a lot of Democrats would know full well that the landslide would represent NOT support for Romney, but a resounding referendum AGAINST Obama, that people were so disgusted with him and so desperate to get rid of him, that they turned out in droves to prove it.
But once embarked on a Romney presidency, ABO and Obama would be forgotten. Six months, one year, two years, into a Romney presidency, we would see moderate Republicans, Romney himself, Democrats, and MSM leftists (but that's redundant!) tersely reminding conservatives of Romney's popular landslide, his mandate, the clear and overwhelming signal from Americans, even Republicans, that they wanted and supported Romney's form of progressivism. That is what the majority in DC would claim, and the numbers would back them up. They would use those numbers to pressure conservative Republicans trying to oppose Romney's agenda.
If Romney wins, I pray to God that it's only on a weak plurality so that ALL of Romney's enemies, both right and left, can say, "But look, most of America voted against him." A plurality would be the only card conservatives could play in combatting Romney's liberalism. Without a plurality, they'd have no cards at all.
A post that absolutely chilled me to the bone, as I was trolling (hey b9 -- ;^), keeping my lure in the water of life!) for FReeper names to add to my list including Jim Robinson, me, and in fact YOU, Tennessee Nana (kindly let me know if I'm in error and I will remove it) of folks who refuse to vote for Romney becasue he's a bridge too far ...
.... ANYWAY, the most chilling post I've seen, the most important and crucial and enlightening, was this one from British FReeper gzzimlich. I wish every ABOer would read and absorb it three times before knee-jerking a response:
I live in a country (the UK) where the “conservative” choice supports gay marriage, socialised healthcare and the “right” of unions to make domestic labour almost prohibitively costly to employers.
I emphasize that this is the “conservative” candidate (David Cameron.)
Romney might seem like a decent option when compared with Obama, but my country - a surveillance state in which the use of “reasonable force” in defending your life and property was only made official policy a couple of years ago - is a prime example of what happens when you compromise your principles and start rationalising voting for the lesser of two evils. -- gzzimlich, posted some months back on Free Republic
ABOers, heed Brother Gzzimlich.
True, I never did see his post(s) making that claim. I didn’t doubt that the claim had been made, so didn’t feel a need to google or do a FR search on it. I thank you for filling in those blanks, and no pardons are necessary.
Still, my comment would have been more correctly and completely stated, “I didn’t see those posts where he claimed to be a psychologist, though it doesn’t surprise me at all that he claimed it. I call bovine excrement on the veracity of his claim. If he’s a psychologist, I’m, well, a space alien.” Or something like that. Sorry for any misunderstanding.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.