Skip to comments.
Freep a Poll! (do you agree with Chik-Fil-A stance on gay marriage?)
dailynews.com ^
| 8-2-12
| LA Daily News
Posted on 08/02/2012 2:40:45 PM PDT by dynachrome
Thursday's Poll Do you agree with Chick-fil-A's stance opposing gay marriage?
Yes
No
(Excerpt) Read more at dailynews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: chikfila; homosexualagenda; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: dynachrome
Yes
541 Votes, or 83.23 %
No
109 Votes, or 16.76 %
21
posted on
08/02/2012 3:20:51 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
To: dynachrome
... Chik-Fil-A stance on gay marriage ... This is why I participated in yesterdays BUYCOTT at Chik-Fil-A (CFA). The inability of the general media, the PC crowd and many politicos to separate ownership from company actions is demonstrated by this poll. CFA has no policy on gay marriage and it is the after-tax profits from risk and ownership that is used by the owner(s) for their desired use. No one has shown any evidence of CFA intention or policy that harmed any non-traditional lifestyle employees or customers.
How about a poll on Progressive Insurance hating marriage? Peter B. Lewis is the founder/principal owner and uses his profits to support LGBT causes as well as Move-On!
22
posted on
08/02/2012 3:24:35 PM PDT
by
SES1066
(Government is NOT the reason for my existence!)
To: Tigercap
Yes
531 Votes, or 82.96 %
No
109 Votes, or 17.03 %
23
posted on
08/02/2012 3:30:05 PM PDT
by
Psalm 144
(Voodoo Republicans. Don't read their lips. Watch their hands.)
To: aruanan
24
posted on
08/02/2012 3:41:35 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: dynachrome
I don't do stupid polls. They are simply clever tools to sway weak minds.
When they include "stupid question" as one of the answers, I might reconsider.
In this particular case, my appropriate answer would be...
...it doesn't matter what I think or you think. It's a Constitutional Violation, fools!
25
posted on
08/02/2012 4:03:41 PM PDT
by
publius911
(Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
To: dynachrome; Bon of Babble
Yes 677 Votes, or 85.15 %
No 118 Votes, or 14.84 %
26
posted on
08/02/2012 4:04:15 PM PDT
by
AZ .44 MAG
(Repeal Obama)
To: dynachrome
27
posted on
08/02/2012 4:10:28 PM PDT
by
patriot08
(TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
To: trisham
I sincerely hope there's a countersuit against this little wet end who filed suit. Since no one has any way of knowing what his sexual orientation or marital status is and since there is no company policy directing the franchisee to refuse service to anyone based on the customer's actual or perceived sexual orientation or marriage status, then there is no way that there is any possible discrimination going on. The CEO of Chick-fil-A is exercising his First Amendment rights in stating his beliefs but he is also accommodating the urge of everyone who has the money to pay to eat his chicken.
If someone, such as the moron who filed suit, doesn't want to eat Chick-fil-A because he doesn't like the beliefs of the CEO, then the only thing that is preventing him from chowing down on chicken is his decision not to do so because of a value judgement he made against the restaurant based on a value judgement he has made against the CEO. His not setting foot in Chick-fil-A is not because he is being excluded by the restaurant but because he is voluntarily excluding himself based on his own values.
The law doesn't provide any relief for anyone who feels he is being discriminated against, only for those who, under the law, are actually being discriminated against. In his case, the only one exercising any discrimination that determines whether or not he avails himself of the product on sale is he himself.
28
posted on
08/02/2012 4:26:11 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: AZ .44 MAG
29
posted on
08/02/2012 4:29:22 PM PDT
by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: dynachrome
Yes
784 Votes (86.43%)
No
123 Votes (13.56%)
Total votes: 907
To: dynachrome
Total Votes = 919
Yes
796 Votes, or 86.61 %
No
123 Votes, or 13.38 %
31
posted on
08/02/2012 5:14:06 PM PDT
by
FrdmLvr
(culture, language, borders)
To: dynachrome
Total Votes = 946
Yes
816 Votes, or 86.25 %
No
130 Votes, or 13.74 %
32
posted on
08/02/2012 5:41:56 PM PDT
by
Morgana
(This space for rent. Cheap.)
To: dynachrome
FReeEEeeped!!
8:23PM California time
Total Votes = 1023
Yes
882 Votes, or 86.21 %
No
141 Votes, or 13.78 %
0bama was OPPOSED to gay marriage before he was FOR it:
During the 2008 presidential debate hosted by Pastor Rick Warren, Obama explained: ‘I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian – for me – for me as a Christian, it is also a sacred union. God’s in the mix. … I am not somebody who promotes same-sex marriage.’
Was he lying then? Or is he lying now? Does he even know the difference!!
33
posted on
08/02/2012 8:30:26 PM PDT
by
Bon of Babble
(The Road to Ruin is Always Kept in Good Repair)
To: dynachrome
They will keep polling (A) until they reach the desired results and (B) until they reach the desired number of click throughs.
34
posted on
08/03/2012 2:06:26 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Eric Holder's NAACP rally against the voter ID laws required the press to bring govt issue photo ID.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson