Posted on 08/29/2012 4:54:52 PM PDT by DallasBiff
It’s the leftists that run the GOP that have burned the bridges.
So I guess you all should contact Eric Holder, about voter fraud.
Do you all think before you post?
Then what force in hell is convincing you to vote FOR him? It's the only thing that really matters, what you're voting for. "Against" is just pretend. Sorry, Jim, but that's truth.
Levin is supporting and will vote for Romney. He, like most us, doesn’t think the world of Willard - but we are going to vote for him. Getting rid of Obama is job number one.
Yes, and then getting rid of Romney and the left wing GOP elites is job number two.
Do you?
Or do you instead reflexively impugn the integrity of anyone who dares to notice dysfunction in the Republican party, especially as regards we who call ourselves 'Conservative'?
I never think before I post. Why, just the other...
oh! Look! A shiny thing!
Riddle time:
Q) How many Ritalin kids does it take to change a light bulb?
A) Let’s go ride our bikes!
And would you like to comment on the democrat party.
I guess to you they are Ozzie and Harriet.
Not the topic you posted. You posted a screed on asking Mark Levin to stop (correctly) observing the dysfunction of the Republican party.
Not sure why you would fail to address my points, and try to change the subject to another political party, unless you were badly losing this argument.
Have a good night, sir.
What you have to do is come up with a winning candidate, and seek the party's base to support that candidate.
Still waiting for you to do that.
BTW, you can't win a general election simply by running advertising on broadcast TV. Most elections are won simply by getting out the vote from your own coalition partners.
You do know what a coalition partner is, right?
If you don't you need to study up on the matter and find out what that's all about.
Not to talk down to you or anything, but I am talking down to you.
It is not “we” who do a disservice, it is those who call themselves conservatives but support liberals.
The opening day of the convention was milk toast at best. Republicans across the country are foaming at the mouth when they even hear Obama’s name mentioned. Good people were looking for a speech the opening day to get them fired up. Instead of a rocket blasting off we got someone letting a baloon fizzle. Why use the old Reagan line, “are you better off today then you were 4 years ago”
Then state some of the following:
When Obama took office gas prices were $1.70 today in many states gas is over $4.00 while Obama refuses to support US oil production yet give Brazil billions of dollars for oil expoloration.
“are you better off today then you were 4 years ago”
Then state how many houses are upside down today
“are you better off today then you were 4 years ago”
State how high food prices have gone up.
“are you better off today then you were 4 years ago”
etc.........
As soon as you do 1/1,00,000th as much as Mark Levin has done for the good of America, let us know, ok?
Until then, dry up and blow away.
GET OFF THE INTERNET, YOU BIG DOPE!
He may have started a bad precedent, which the Supreme Court verified with the outrageous Roe V. Wade verdict, but Reagan later on was a very pro-life advocate.
Yes, I know Reagan was pro-abortion, but he unlike romney, Reagan became pro-life stayed completely pro-life and PASSIONATELY spoke out for the babies and against those who thought it was ok to murder a baby. That was my point. Reagan never flipped like romney does. Romney talks about being pro-life, which he is not and that is why he he has no passion on the issue. Abortion is just a political box he needs to check off and hope voters don't look to close to see he's just playing politics with babies lives. With romney liberals will get to kill innocent babies because their father was a criminal, as well as the life and health (health is bogus) and gay adoption. Pro-lifers hear he is 100% pro-life (which is a joke) and for family values-his idea of family values. He apparently want gays to enjoy his value of families.
Ronald Reagan appointed Sandra Day O’Connor to the Supreme Court.
Puritanical Reaganite? I have no idea what that is, just like I'm not sure what Romney is.
Maybe if we had a better idea of what Mitt is Mark would feel better?
Or, maybe Mark knows exactly what Mitt is and is acting accordingly?
Hard to say for sure. Need less complaining and whining and more info or we'll get more obama.
You know what they say about reelecting obama: Better the devil you know than the ???? you don't.
I wonder if Rush & Levin are upset because they aren’t speaking at the convention?
I wonder how they'd feel about giving the Romney people their speech for review and changes before being allowed to speak?
I don't think that would go over very well with either man, but I could be wrong about that.
This.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.