Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/02/2012 6:31:30 AM PST by Altariel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Altariel

Of course the EPA can’t be reached for comment. The studies conflict with their version of reality.


2 posted on 12/02/2012 6:37:21 AM PST by Renderofveils (My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music. - Nabokov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Didn’t we go through something similar during the Exxon Valdes cleanup? Harm of the cleanup?


3 posted on 12/02/2012 6:48:17 AM PST by libertarian27 (Check my profile page for the FReeper Online Cookbook 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Wash a sink of dishes with Dawn (the same degreasing used in BP leak) and let it sit for several hours. Drain the water and feel the bottom of the sink, it will be covered with grease because it breaks it down, then it sinks.

Now imagine the bottom of the Gulf.


4 posted on 12/02/2012 7:01:44 AM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

This was already known at the time.

Obama ordered the dispersant used in large quantities, because it was made in a factory owned by his Chicago cronies.

Obama also seems to have done everything he could to slow the repairs down, although that also could have been the incompetant Coast Guard commander who was put in charge. Other countries offered to help, but Obama refused to let them in.


5 posted on 12/02/2012 7:05:44 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

The first thing I thought was why is this person writing this? What are his motives. Then I questioned the “science” behind it. Is this some more junk science like global warming?


6 posted on 12/02/2012 7:13:58 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel
Not surprised. There was plenty of anecdotal evidence that the dispersant was making a lot of people very sick.
7 posted on 12/02/2012 7:16:15 AM PST by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

how many million gallons of sea water is in the gulf? In the end, how many parts per Trillion is the dispersant vs sea water? I suspect that if you drank the water in the gulf, the salt would kill you long before you were affected by any chemicals.

To have a government enviromental agency report that they find toxins is like paying the wolf to guard the hen house.

Foolish, at best.


8 posted on 12/02/2012 8:03:57 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Petroleum is a natural organic compound. Bacteria love the stuff. Natural bacteria would have taken care of it. But then you can’t call it a crisis and not let it go to waste.


10 posted on 12/02/2012 8:34:59 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Labor unions are the Communist Party of the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Yet AFAIK scientists are presently unable to quantify any significant damage to the Gulf’s ecosystem as a result of the spill.

I’m not averse to the idea put forward here, but suspect the authors’ agenda is not to find better ways to clean up spills, but rather to ban all offshore drilling as too dangerous for the environment.


11 posted on 12/02/2012 8:46:16 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

I recall reading an article in 2010 about this. It was known from European experience at the time about the toxicity of the dispersants, but they were used anyway.

Somewhere in the archives is an article on that very matter. It was posted here at Free Republic for those of you who enjoy doing research.


14 posted on 12/02/2012 11:07:19 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

So this research could be validated by going to the Gulf and determining whether there were any live animals in the Gulf, correct?


15 posted on 12/02/2012 11:47:39 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel
You mean that nobody at Nalco, or the EPA, at any time ever thought to see how this stuff reacted with oil and salt water? They, just like, kinda' found out after the fact?
16 posted on 12/02/2012 3:35:21 PM PST by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson