Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus; edge919; butterdezillion

Just to clearify things.

Dr.Taitz submitted a copy of the LFBC in her First Amended Complaint in Missippi (page 69 of 157). Like several of her exhibits the LFBC copy was faded. Attorney’s for the MDEC included in their Memorandum Brief of Authorities in Support of Motion For Judgement on the Pleadings, a copy of the LFBC. In Footnote 10, they noted,

“10. See FAC at page 12 ¶ 1 and page 36 ¶ b. Although Plaintiffs do attach a couple copies of the LFBC to their FAC, it – Like many of Plaintiffs exhibits – is barely legible. While Plaintiffs reference the COLB in their Complaint (at page 36 ¶ b), the MDEC was unable to find a copy of that document contained in Plaintiffs voluminous and disorganized exhibits. Therefore, the MDEC has attached to its Motion a legible a copy of the LFBC (Motion Exhibit 1) and COLB (Motion Exhibit 2).”

Dr. Taitz then filed a motion for sanctions claiming that the MDEC attorneys had “uttering forged documents and attempting to incriminate this court and making Honorable Judge Wingate and Honorable Magistrate Anderson complicit in aiding and abetting forgery by seeking a judicial notice of forged documents.”

MDEC attorneys filed a response to her motion that they had not asked the court to take judical notice of the LFBC but only of the statements made by Health Director Fukino. Later they filed a motion to supplement that response and included the Dr. Onaka verification.


142 posted on 01/13/2013 4:18:19 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan
“10. See FAC at page 12 ¶ 1 and page 36 ¶ b. Although Plaintiffs do attach a couple copies of the LFBC to their FAC, it – Like many of Plaintiffs exhibits – is barely legible. While Plaintiffs reference the COLB in their Complaint (at page 36 ¶ b), the MDEC was unable to find a copy of that document contained in Plaintiffs voluminous and disorganized exhibits. Therefore, the MDEC has attached to its Motion a legible a copy of the LFBC (Motion Exhibit 1) and COLB (Motion Exhibit 2).”

Interesting. So they only presented their own printouts/photocopies because of legibility?? It should have been a lot easier and much more legible just to submit ANY of the alleged hard copies of the LFBC and COLB that Obama (or more likely his campaign) already possesses.

MDEC attorneys filed a response to her motion that they had not asked the court to take judical notice of the LFBC but only of the statements made by Health Director Fukino. Later they filed a motion to supplement that response and included the Dr. Onaka verification.

That's a lot more effort than should have been required to simply get one of the two alleged hard copies of the LFBC that Barry already has. Weird.

148 posted on 01/13/2013 11:43:26 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson