[edge919]

“10. See FAC at page 12 ¶ 1 and page 36 ¶ b. Although Plaintiffs do attach a couple copies of the LFBC to their FAC, it – Like many of Plaintiffs exhibits – is barely legible. While Plaintiffs reference the COLB in their Complaint (at page 36 ¶ b), the MDEC was unable to find a copy of that document contained in Plaintiffs voluminous and disorganized exhibits. Therefore, the MDEC has attached to its Motion a legible a copy of the LFBC (Motion Exhibit 1) and COLB (Motion Exhibit 2).”

Interesting. So they only presented their own printouts/photocopies because of legibility?? It should have been a lot easier and much more legible just to submit ANY of the alleged hard copies of the LFBC and COLB that Obama (or more likely his campaign) already possesses.

MDEC attorneys filed a response to her motion that they had not asked the court to take judical notice of the LFBC but only of the statements made by Health Director Fukino. Later they filed a motion to supplement that response and included the Dr. Onaka verification.

That's a lot more effort than should have been required to simply get one of the two alleged hard copies of the LFBC that Barry already has. Weird.

[4Zoltan]

“That’s a lot more effort.”

Not really. The defense attorneys know that there is not a court in the US that would not readily accept the white house pdf as proof of birth in Hawaii. I suspect the letter of verification was requested to show how frivolous the claims of fogery are and it will be used when they seek sanctions and legal fees. They have already sent Dr. Taitz notice that they intend to do just that.