“That’s a lot more effort.”
Not really. The defense attorneys know that there is not a court in the US that would not readily accept the white house pdf as proof of birth in Hawaii. I suspect the letter of verification was requested to show how frivolous the claims of fogery are and it will be used when they seek sanctions and legal fees. They have already sent Dr. Taitz notice that they intend to do just that.
Please explain away the frivolous claims of forgery shown here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2977726/posts?page=11#11
This is still more effort than simply presenting one of the two allegedly certified documents already obtained by the co-defendant — the actual document should be irrefutable proof if it was actually submitted to the court (providing it’s valid). A letter of verification that doesn’t legally verifiy any birth facts doesn’t show the claims of fogery to be frivolous.