Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AR-15 Rifle or the so-called "Assault Weapon" was not used in Newtown
MSNBC ^ | Dec 15, 2012 erroneous video report

Posted on 01/26/2013 3:13:31 PM PST by agondonter

Edited on 01/26/2013 3:25:39 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

oops - broken link


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: ar15rifle; assualtweapon; banglist; guncontrol; newtown; notagain; sandyhook; sandyhooktruthers; secondamendment; tinfoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last
To: RummyChick

Ohhh — sorry.

Did you read it???


101 posted on 01/27/2013 5:41:05 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
"Multiple places "

"And they are neither gub’mnt or msm."

OK I'm from Missouri, show me.

(And its "Gub'ment" not "gub'mnt")

102 posted on 01/27/2013 5:41:22 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

What good would that do?? I would have to use the internet to show you and you don’t trust the internet.


103 posted on 01/27/2013 5:46:53 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Of course I read it.

I also posted the actual info from the company.


104 posted on 01/27/2013 5:49:11 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
"I would have to use the internet to show you and you don’t trust the internet."

QED

105 posted on 01/27/2013 5:50:01 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Since you read it, what does this mean:

"As if the confusion regarding the .223 vs 5.56 chambers wasn’t enough, there is a third possibility in the mix, that is being used by at least one major manufacturer. The .223 Wylde chamber is a modified SAAMI-spec .223 chamber that allows for the safe use of 5.56 NATO rounds, but maintains tighter tolerances for better accuracy."

Is that saying that you could have a 223 AR-15 that is designed to safely fire 5.56 rounds???

106 posted on 01/27/2013 6:03:51 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Figment; Mad Dawg
wipe your screen off. You were spitting as as you wrote that crapMore like you were on your knees licking a boot.

Funny how Alinsky works both ways, ain't it?

Oh, and wipe your chin when you get done.

107 posted on 01/27/2013 6:09:53 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Figment; Mad Dawg
wipe your screen off. You were spitting as as you wrote that crap

More like you were on your knees licking a boot.

Funny how Alinsky works both ways, ain't it?

Oh, and wipe your chin when you get done.

108 posted on 01/27/2013 6:10:04 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
QED

QED x 2

109 posted on 01/27/2013 6:10:29 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I have posted more than once that Bushmaster has said that their barrel has been developed to handle the 5.56 bullet. I even posted the link from Bushmaster.

Don’t tell me you didn’t read it.

You read every post that I wrote yesterday on that thread.


110 posted on 01/27/2013 6:12:18 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip; Mad Dawg
So then does that mean that the consulate in Benghazzi didn't burn down, and that the ambassador is still alive, and none of it ever happened???

Your troll panties are showing.

111 posted on 01/27/2013 6:13:23 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Since Uncle Chip continues to play ridiculous games

HEre is some info from Bushmaster AGAIN
http://www.bushmaster.com/faqs/afmviewfaq.aspx?faqid=1343


112 posted on 01/27/2013 6:15:37 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I’m sorry but I just remember you being very upset yesterday over an EMS referring to the casings at the scene as being 5.56 with posts like this:

“You aren’t suppose to use 556 in a 223 because of excessive pressure”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2981821/posts?page=120#120

But I’m glad you cleared that up because it appears that a Bushmaster 223 can safely fire 5.56 ammunition so it wouldn’t be a surprise to find 5.56 brass at the scene, now would it???


113 posted on 01/27/2013 6:57:09 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
you pinged the wrong dawg.

I've 2 "g"s

114 posted on 01/27/2013 6:59:58 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Crap, I hate when I do that!

Hope you got all of the posts regardless!

115 posted on 01/27/2013 7:23:06 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip; RummyChick
“You aren’t suppose to use 556 in a 223 because of excessive pressure”

She is correct, the wall thickness of the two cartridges are different.

The 5.56 case has thicker walls to handle higher pressures, meaning the interior volume of the case is smaller than that of a .223. This will alter the loading data used when reloading 5.56 brass to .223 specs.

Wrong again chippy....

http://www.humanevents.com/2011/02/15/223-remington-vs-556-nato-what-you-dont-know-could-hurt-you/

116 posted on 01/27/2013 7:28:50 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I did, no worries.


117 posted on 01/27/2013 7:37:47 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron; RummyChick
Wrong again chippy....

Oh then I guess you missed her link at #112 that reads accordingly:

"All Bushmaster barrels are chambered to accept 5.56mm ammunition and always have been.... so that the 5.56 ammunition can safely be used."

118 posted on 01/27/2013 7:54:54 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: jjotto; RummyChick

Video I came across that is interesting. Especially the early part on rifles.

WARNING - graphic in spots. First graphic picture is probably the worst and it is after the 8 minute mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tku8YI68-JA

What is interesting is the wounds that rifles make vs. handguns. Also that the .223 fragmenting bullet may not start its devastating cavitation actions early enough in a small body and may still pass through due to the velocity. See at 7:05.

As for the powerful assault rifle .223 listen to the doctors comments at 7:34. ‘This is a very small caliber. This is one of the reason the military is looking at larger caliber ammunition’. So much for the powerful .223 ‘assault rifle’.

But the overall point is the dozens of wounds it should have been obvious not only to the ME but to anyone who was trained whether the wounds were rifle or handgun.


119 posted on 01/27/2013 7:57:26 PM PST by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

When everyone sees the surveillance video it will not be debated...

When is are the lapdogs like Brian Williams and Cooper Anderson and little Ms. Katie going to push for that? Or push for in the Aurora shooting? Lapdogs. Or useful idiots.


120 posted on 01/27/2013 8:13:10 PM PST by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson