IIRC he is either the largest or second largest single shareholder.
But not to worry...
Mon Feb 15 15:08:11 2010 · 99 of 383
BuckeyeTexan to null and voidI know Im absolutely right. That 5.7% ownership stake gets the holding company (and effectively the Saudi) a vote on News Corp shareholder issues. It doesnt get him input into Fox News programming.
I have the second largest number of shares in an S-corp and I get to vote on shareholder issues. What I dont get to do is tell the majority owner how to do business. I have an opinion, which, as you well know, I am happy to share even when it isnt requested. An opinion doesnt equate to input into corporate policy.
Say it aint so, nully. Tell me you dont really believe that Saudi-controlled claim.
Tex
I love it when you harass me, nully. It makes me feel loved. :)
Which begs the question - why would someone on fr be such a supporter of Saudis? And oddly enough, was such a virulent slammer of “birthers” from the moment its feet hit the ground on fr?