Mr. Kronenberg, I think you’re nuts. You seem to think people should be happy paying 10-20% more for new vs used? After you repeatedly stress that many of these cars haven’t been redesigned in several years and you can’t tell new from used.
You even admit in the article, “The typical 2- to 3-year-old car costs around 30% less than its new counterpart.”
Sorry, can’t understand your logic.
Sorry, can’t understand your logic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Its all about the mileage. Basically there is no difference between a 2009 Honda Fit and a ‘13.
Except of course 60,000 miles.
Most people would rather pay the 3 of 4 thousand bucks extra and get brand new with 0 miles.