Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MLB, this game is....
Self | 10-26-13 | self

Posted on 10/26/2013 8:00:20 PM PDT by foundedonpurpose

No live thread on the game. I've never seen the Cardinals make such stupid decisions.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Sports
KEYWORDS: mlb; series; world
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Yup. Holy cow, wiki already has a Jim Joyce-centric update on the obstruction rule.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_(baseball)

“Any case of obstruction falls into one of two categories generally called type “A” and type “B”, after the subsection of Official Baseball Rule 7.06,[2] in which each type of obstruction is described.

Type A obstruction occurs when the obstructed runner is being played upon[clarification needed] by the fielders. The ball is immediately dead, and all runners are awarded the base that the umpire judges the runners would have reached without the obstruction; however, the obstructed runner must be awarded at least one base. Umpiring practice grants a broad interpretation of whether a runner is being played upon; if the defense’s actions as a whole are focused on a runner, he qualifies as being played upon for the purposes of determining the penalty for obstruction.

Type B obstruction occurs when the obstructed runner is not being played upon. The ball does not become dead; rather, the umpire calls “That’s obstruction!”, but play is allowed to continue. While play continues, the umpire privately decides what base the obstructed runner would have reached without the obstruction. The obstructed runner is now “protected” until he reaches that base. When playing action stops, the ball will become dead and the runner will be awarded that base if he has not reached it. If he was put out before he reaches that base, that out will be nullified and he will be awarded that base. If the runner reaches that base safely, the obstruction is ignored. If the runner continues past that base, he does so at his own risk, without protection. There is no minimum base award for type B obstruction.”

Don’t know if that has been manipulated already!

Freegards


21 posted on 10/26/2013 9:24:09 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas
The Cardinals are busy playing baseball tonight. Maybe that’s why they didn’t start a thread,

Sending bill for new keyboard!

22 posted on 10/26/2013 9:26:21 PM PDT by Ken H (First rule of gun safety - have a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Rules is rules.

As Forrest sez: "Sh*t Happens ..." - just ask Bill Buckner !!!

Speaking of Buckner, did you know he tried to shoot himself after that game - but the bullet went between his legz ...

23 posted on 10/26/2013 9:44:39 PM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Dumb call. the obstruction occurred because the runner left base line to trip over the third baseman. Middlebrooks was outside of the baseline.


24 posted on 10/26/2013 9:45:51 PM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JIM O

No way. Good, gutsy call, clear case of obstruction. Runner had every right to be where he was. Not out of baseline at all.


25 posted on 10/26/2013 9:48:24 PM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

Exactly. The obstruction undoubtedly affected the play. Good call.


26 posted on 10/26/2013 9:50:15 PM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: foundedonpurpose

VeRy exciting game between two well-matched teams. Great defensive plays. And what an ending! I’v never seen that before.

Cards win 5-4 on a game-ending obstruction call. Amazing!


27 posted on 10/26/2013 9:53:17 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
tried to cheat

Well, he does play for the Red Sox.

28 posted on 10/26/2013 9:54:34 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

I have done some amateur umpiring, and that call is correct. The “leg lift” that Middlebrooks did is the obstruction.


29 posted on 10/26/2013 9:55:49 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

Didn’t look like he lifted his legs up to trip him up, in my opinion, just looked like he was trying to get up. That doesn’t matter, him just laying there like a boneless chicken would have been enough to call obstruction if the runner had to step over him.

And for some reason the Cardinals like to play fruity euro-gay techno dance music in their clubhouse after a world series win.

Freegards


30 posted on 10/26/2013 10:01:08 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TBP
I’v never seen that before

I once saw (in person) the Dodgers win a game due to catcher interference. That's not the strange part. The offending catcher was Johnny Friggin' Bench!!!

31 posted on 10/26/2013 10:18:01 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Obamacare: You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The call was 100% right.


32 posted on 10/26/2013 10:46:41 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The call was 100% wrong! Controversial in the least, and umps and refs should never decide games, especially big games. The guy was out at the plate. Boston got robbed. . . . besides which, the same ump all night long called pitches below the knees “strikes” for the SL pitchers, the opposite for the Sox. Bias in the extreme.


33 posted on 10/26/2013 10:54:58 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MrChips
Controversial in the least, and umps and refs should never decide games, especially big games.

One way or the other, the Umpire was going to decide the game, even he ruled no obstruction, in a way he is still impacting the game.

34 posted on 10/26/2013 10:56:10 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

Watch closely and you will also see that the runner pushed Middle brooks back down as he was trying to get up.


35 posted on 10/26/2013 10:56:37 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

impacting because he is the ump, but not deciding. Why play at all?


36 posted on 10/26/2013 10:57:26 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JIM O

This is true. Middlebrooks was stretched out on the ground and yet his feet were still some distance from the base line. Thus, it was not obstruction at all. Horrendous call.


37 posted on 10/26/2013 10:59:35 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

It was a terrible call in my opinion. And the runner was outside of the baseline. He tripped over the upper part of his legs which were flat on the ground. A home field “advantage” call if there ever was one.


38 posted on 10/26/2013 11:02:10 PM PDT by jy8z (When push comes disguised as nudge, I do not budge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

except that the runner was NOT in the base line.


39 posted on 10/26/2013 11:02:50 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jy8z
And the runner was outside of the baseline.

You might want to read up on the difference between the baseline and the basepath.

I'll wait...

40 posted on 10/26/2013 11:05:41 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (Proportionally, Ft. Hood is to Ft. Worth as Washington Navy Yard is to Arlington, VA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson