Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Take Out 1,500 Tanks in Two Years
War is Boring ^ | November 18, 2013 | David Axe

Posted on 11/18/2013 7:18:23 AM PST by C19fan

In 24 months of brutal combat, Syrian opposition fighters have eliminated a fifth of Pres. Bashar Al Assad’s Russian-made tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, according to estimates.

That’s no fewer than 1,500 T-55, T-62 and T-72 tanks plus BMP fighting vehicles exploded, burned, disabled or seized by rebels—with potentially thousands of crewmen also being killed, injured or captured.

The destruction of so many of the government’s heavy vehicles by relatively lightly armed rebels is, for the regime, a painful reminder of the vulnerability of even the most thickly armored tanks in close urban fighting—and especially when the vehicles aren’t protected by nearby infantry.

(Excerpt) Read more at medium.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: syria; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: from occupied ga

Right-O and your key point as I understand it is that the populace is equiped with rifles and other small arms but nothing larger so that the DHS vehicles would have free reign.

I wonder what percentage of such police-type APC vehicles are vulnerable to .50 Barretts?...or even .338 Lapua?


21 posted on 11/18/2013 9:39:33 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Regarding the lack of combined arms teams by Syrians: This tells you something about their infantry. By comparison, look at how we deployed a combined arms team in the Second Battle of Fallujjah.


22 posted on 11/18/2013 9:40:28 AM PST by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

How many were taken out by IED`s?


23 posted on 11/18/2013 9:42:12 AM PST by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
All the fancy hardware in the world can not save you if you do not have the supplies and support to keep them on the front line.

Don't forget about General Mud and General Winter. Those two can wreak havoc on mech units.

24 posted on 11/18/2013 9:54:40 AM PST by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24
as I understand it is that the populace is equiped with rifles and other small arms but nothing larger so that the DHS vehicles would have free reign.

Yes. Exactly. M113's supposedly are vulnerable to .50 side and back. I also read somplace that MRAPS are designed to resist 14.5mm. Since this has about twice the energy of a .50 cal I would also suspect that they could defeat a .50 cal.

25 posted on 11/18/2013 10:21:00 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit
DHS take note. Those MWRAPs will fail for a whole bunch of reasons and repairability may not be an option.

Set traps, set fire, cook contents. Repeat as necessary.

26 posted on 11/18/2013 11:02:01 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
A MRAP is NOT a battlefield vehicle. Wouldn't last ten minutes with modern anti-armor ordinance. These things that the govt is bestowing on police forces throughout the the land of the formerly free are designed for supressing a civilian population armed with small arms.

We won't have anti-armor ordinance anyway. Trap 'em, burn 'em.

27 posted on 11/18/2013 11:05:03 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
We won't have anti-armor ordinance anyway.

Yes - that is the point I'm making. We DON'T have that ability due to decades of gun control.

Trap 'em, burn 'em.

A lot harder than popping up and firing an RPG.

28 posted on 11/18/2013 11:14:32 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I know the Russians are supplying Assad with weapons and training but I wonder how much they are helping on the repair end of things. I assume the warranty on a T-55 expired back when everything I knew about tanks came from playing Combat on my my Atari 2600.


29 posted on 11/18/2013 11:32:15 AM PST by Pan_Yan (Who told you that you were naked? Genesis 3:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

“Reading about Patton’s WW2 team, they were like race car pit crews when it came to tank repair.”

Recalled from an uncle/tank commander’s tale telling: “Generally, a tank battle would be three or four tanks on each side, would range over three or four square miles, and would last three or four days. We’d hide from their bigger guns, only coming out to irritate them with our little guns. After a few days their tanks would break down or run out of fuel. They’d light them on fire and walk home. When our tanks broke down, they’d be fixed on the spot.”


30 posted on 11/18/2013 11:33:42 AM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

I’m reading a neat book by Brig Gen Al Irzyk (”He Rode Up Front for Patton”)

His tank was hit in the turret from behind by an AP round in the Bastogne battle. The round cracked the structure but failed to penetrate, and the maintenance crew welded it up overnight, and he was back in it the next day. Impressive.


31 posted on 11/18/2013 11:48:50 AM PST by nascarnation (Wish everyone you see a "Gay Kwanzaa")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

We won’t have anti-armor ordinance anyway. Trap ‘em, burn ‘em.
************************************
heavy equipment would be nice , maybe wheeled loaders... and thermite , lots of thermite.


32 posted on 11/18/2013 2:43:44 PM PST by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Assad is not an Islamist. He protects the Christians in Syria as his father did as well. This is ancient Christianity.


33 posted on 11/18/2013 11:35:09 PM PST by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

sez 1500 tanks is (was) one fifth of Syria’s force, or 7500 tanks total. The figure is nonsense. If however the various other armored vehicles (and heavy military vehicles of other kinds) are added in, they might add up to 7500.

Urban renewal in the third world includes demolishing narrow streets and putting the new buildings well away from where tanks might be used — tanks could otherwise be buried by blowing out a building foundation, leaving the tankers immobilized and trapped.

http://www.janes.com/article/26112/chemical-weapons-used-against-civilians-in-syria


34 posted on 11/23/2013 10:31:34 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Must have come as a blow:

http://blogs.channel4.com/lindsey-hilsum-on-international-affairs/damascus-funeral-major-general-joseph-fadlallah-dakhlallah/3110

The Syrian government has said little about the attack in which he lost his life. An official told us only 22 were killed when rebels tunneled under the military vehicle maintenance centre at Harasta last Sunday. But rebel video posted online shows such a huge blast it seems impossible that so few should have died.


35 posted on 11/23/2013 1:14:09 PM PST by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson